Q_Sertorius
WKR
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2024
- Messages
- 4,645
I wonder if any ZP5s were in the mix ...
There was one there and it also was great in low light. That thing was basically cheating.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wonder if any ZP5s were in the mix ...
Well, I will say that I didn’t get the trigger time that some other folks got with them at S2H, but I did get to see and handle them. The low light performance was clearly superior to a SWFA 6x. But, moving forward, I am gravitating more towards “one main rifle.” So, I don’t foresee an immediate justification for having one of these on each of my rifles.
@ekupp had one on his rifle.I wonder if any ZP5s were in the mix ...
I have a few Mavens, so I'm looking forward to waiting 6+ months for the ZT. Refresh, refresh, refresh.Shot about an entire day at the university with one of these bad boys. Compared to the Mavens it's a huge jump in glass clarity.
The reticle is pretty epic too!
Must have been a pretty good jolt.Particularly after I watched someone hurl a rifle with the S2H scope mounted on it so hard that it snapped the wooden stock in half.
To my eyes, SWFA glass is crap, even the HD. I tried to like it, and just couldn't get past it.Now that the Maven is $1400 and the SWFA 3-9 is available, I would not even consider the Maven.
Must have been a pretty good jolt.
Where did it break? What stock and rifle?
We hunt in the dark here (coastal plain, SE USA).To my eyes, SWFA glass is crap, even the HD. I tried to like it, and just couldn't get past it.
To my eyes, SWFA glass is crap, even the HD. I tried to like it, and just couldn't get past it.
Let's test it.I don’t know whether a production wooden Rokstok would have broken.
To my eyes, SWFA glass is crap, even the HD. I tried to like it, and just couldn't get past it.