- Joined
- Oct 22, 2014
- Messages
- 14,779
I imagine this scope is getting the sh*t beat out of it. Any idea on round count? @Formidilosus
Several thousand on all three.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I imagine this scope is getting the sh*t beat out of it. Any idea on round count? @Formidilosus
You already know the time and place, so is there a need for the email? I hope they go out for the folks that aren’t in this thread, but it’s already been shared when the drop will occur.Hope the emails go out for the next drop.![]()
I’m not, some are though. I honestly missed the humor and was just trying to help you outYou guys are taking things to serious.
I disagree. They have sent out every scope to be tested that has been asked for. They changed the RS4.2 to have the same erector system as the RS6 specifically because of the zero retention testing here.Maven sort of disregards the drop test and says theie scopes are all built to the same quality standard. Which means they're not acknowledging anything at all and they likely won't make any public statement if they decide to start changing the internals on their current models.
I can’t speak for other poster, but there was a podcast with the maven guys a while ago, where they kind of dismissed, and laughed at the testing. I think that’s what he is alluding to.I disagree. They have sent out every scope to be tested that has been asked for. They changed the RS4.2 to have the same erector system as the RS6 specifically because of the zero retention testing here.
Maybe things changea while ago,
I can’t speak for other poster, but there was a podcast with the maven guys a while ago, where they kind of dismissed, and laughed at the testing. I think that’s what he is alluding to.
Correct, that is what I was referring to. Hopefully they've changed their opinion, at least privately and will work to update their other models.Maybe things change
I wasn't aware the RS6 or RS4.2 were able to pass a drop test. Maybe I just missed it. If not, hopefully they test them soon. Be nice to see companies bring more durable products to market but I understand the desire not to tank their existing catalog. You would think adding some sort of nomenclature to differentiate certain models from standard models wouldn't tank the main line. "XR" for extra rugged or something and then drop the price of the old model by $1-200 so their is an incentive to buy out old inventory or pay up for the better feature set. Not much different from a standard laptop vs a Toughbook as an example. Tons of examples like that in the worldI disagree. They have sent out every scope to be tested that has been asked for. They changed the RS4.2 to have the same erector system as the RS6 specifically because of the zero retention testing here.
The 4.2 has not been tested notoriously yet.I wasn't aware the RS6 or RS4.2 were able to pass a drop test.
You mean, Formidiously?The 4.2 has not been tested notoriously yet.