ZeroTech TRACE ADV 3-18×44 FFP Shoot2Hunt

Well, I think you figured it all out. This is all a big scam, the people involved are just shills, and we are all just a bunch of suckers in a cult that simply do not have your incisive wisdom. Well done, internet guy. Very well done indeed.
Here to help!
 
Who will be the independent testers of this scope? Obviously it can't be folks associated with Shoot 2 Hunt or Rokslide considering they stand to profit roughly 75k per month on the sales. Just wondering where and how that will be done.
I wonder if they'll give one to someone other than form to throw on the ground and test. Will be interesting.
They aren't mounting every scope and performing a drop test on every one. They are performing a collimator test similar to NF per this post from Ryan.

 
I wonder if they'll give one to someone other than form to throw on the ground and test. Will be interesting.
It's clear from reading Rokslide that there are many critics out there. This scope will undergo testing by more independent reviewers than any other. However, the reality is that you won’t find any bigger critics of this scope than Form and me.
 
I guess I didn't notice what this is solving that the industry has been ignoring? Besides not being able to find the length of the scope without reading through the forum, it seems like just another scope to me.
I like it's zero stop, locking diopter, illumination, and parallax. But none of that is new?
Not interested in any of the reticles....and that's always been a deal breaker for me.




You mean like that big Shoot2Hunt logo on the side?
I could do without that for sure,hope they rethink that.
Look around most guys are particular with 500 different color combinations of rokstocks.
 
In my opinion, Ryan and Form have much more to lose by releasing a questionable scope. I lean to the side of this scope getting much more abuse than others. At some point you either trust the process they are following or you don’t. You’re free to purchase, or not. Is there another scope company with high standards and some transparency?
 
Scopes look like they are right on track to be great. What is a negative with the scopes? Anything you wish you could change or should be changed? @RancherJohn

I did not really find anything I wanted to change, but I also did not shoot it or carry it as much as some of the other guys. I did not personally slip turrets or reset the zero stop, but in watching it done I did not see anything I would have different there. Some may want a locking elevation turret, but in use I did not see the lack of a lock being a drawback, nor did I have the elevation turret dial itself even when carried in a gunbearer where the scope rides against my body. I did not carry it strapped under the wing of my pack. The illumination button seemed to work well, but I did not carry it enough to see if it would get bumped on during normal use nor did I get a good idea of battery life (not that it really matters, but would be good to know). A dial illumination would not be immune from the same problems, and may be worse (increased complexity in that design being another issue).

As a side note, I did not have issues with my Maven dialing itself in use but there may be 2 reasons why, 1) I only carried it for a few days as well and 2) I used an o-ring from @Bluumoon. My Maven turret was not mushy or overly firm, but the parallax did stiffen in the cold. Other shooters did have a few times where their RS1.2s dialed a few tenths, but I can't remember who had done what regarding o-rings and/or electrical tape.

It honestly felt like a properly built mk5HD, with the benefits of a smaller profile and better reticle. If production models match the ones we used (and I have no reason to doubt that based on LOW's track record), I think it will punch well above it's price class in all categories.
 
Back
Top