ZCO 420 or New Kahles K328i???

[Ludo]

I currently own the ZCO 420 and I love it. My only wish is that it had a bit more reach. Now that this new Kahles K328i is out, It’s very tempting to change things up for a little more zoom. My only issue with the Kahles is that it’s only available in Mils (I’m a MOA guy). Does ANYONE out there have any experience with both of these? I haven’t been able to get my hands on one yet. Open to all thoughts/comments on the subject!

 

[28bang]

I do. Had the zco 420 before the kahles. I like the kahles better. FOV on the low end for hunting is great. Really like the new skmr+ reticle. Always liked the kahles turrets and setup. Nothing wrong with the zco. I just wanted more FOV on the low end. Eye box is great throughout mag range, 3.5-28.

 

[Ludo]

I think I’m on the same page. I love this ZCO, it’s bullet proof, but the FOV on the Kahles seems unreal. I hate that both of them are 36oz, but that’s a moot point.

 

[Mathews2000]

I’m going to bump this to see if there are any new input out there.

 

[ballistictip1088]

I’ve shot both. Glass on both is great. I prefer the turrets on the Zco. Although the wind turret feels different from the elevation turret which is weird. The parallax is also a bit better on the Zco imo. The FOV is stellar on the Kahles. The skmr + is a pretty solid reticle but I think they should have left of the .5 tenths hash mark on the elevation holdovers.
In a perfect world I could get the new mpct 1x Zco reticle in a kahles scope. Both are killer scopes and it comes down to the details and purpose between the 2.