Tell us about it, what you’ve since learned, and how things have changed.
Mine was a cow at about 75 yards. I was shooting a Ruger No. 1 in .30-06 with a 220 grain Core Lokt and open sights (receiver peep sight, not buckhorn sights). I had a military style shooting sling and was leaning across a big rock “looped up” in it. That cow went down like she was poleaxed.
220s, you say? Yes, I was influenced in that decision by Ernest Hemingway’s description of a lion hunt.
“Macomber stepped out of the curved opening at the side of the front seat, onto the step and down onto the ground. The lion still stood looking majestically and coolly toward this object that his eyes only showed in silhouette, bulking like some super-rhino. There was no man smell carried toward him and he watched the object, moving his great head a little from side to side. Then watching the object, not afraid, but hesitating before going down the bank to drink with such a thing opposite him, he saw a man figure detach itself from it and he turned his heavy head and swung away toward the cover of the trees as he heard a cracking crash and felt the slam of a .30-06 220-grain solid bullet that bit his flank and ripped in sudden hot scalding nausea through his stomach.” - Ernest Hemingway
And really, the 220s were not a bad choice. At 2400, the trajectory is a bit like a shot put. But I was shooting with open sights anyway.
I’ve since mounted a scope on that rifle and gone to 165s.
I gutted that cow and quartered her by sawing through the spine lengthwise and cutting up along the back rib. I carried her down the mountain in four big chunks, bone and all.
These days, in addition to shooting with scopes and using lighter bullets, I seldom gut an elk. I bone it out where it falls.
I still like military shooting slings.
Mine was a cow at about 75 yards. I was shooting a Ruger No. 1 in .30-06 with a 220 grain Core Lokt and open sights (receiver peep sight, not buckhorn sights). I had a military style shooting sling and was leaning across a big rock “looped up” in it. That cow went down like she was poleaxed.
220s, you say? Yes, I was influenced in that decision by Ernest Hemingway’s description of a lion hunt.
“Macomber stepped out of the curved opening at the side of the front seat, onto the step and down onto the ground. The lion still stood looking majestically and coolly toward this object that his eyes only showed in silhouette, bulking like some super-rhino. There was no man smell carried toward him and he watched the object, moving his great head a little from side to side. Then watching the object, not afraid, but hesitating before going down the bank to drink with such a thing opposite him, he saw a man figure detach itself from it and he turned his heavy head and swung away toward the cover of the trees as he heard a cracking crash and felt the slam of a .30-06 220-grain solid bullet that bit his flank and ripped in sudden hot scalding nausea through his stomach.” - Ernest Hemingway
And really, the 220s were not a bad choice. At 2400, the trajectory is a bit like a shot put. But I was shooting with open sights anyway.
I’ve since mounted a scope on that rifle and gone to 165s.
I gutted that cow and quartered her by sawing through the spine lengthwise and cutting up along the back rib. I carried her down the mountain in four big chunks, bone and all.
These days, in addition to shooting with scopes and using lighter bullets, I seldom gut an elk. I bone it out where it falls.
I still like military shooting slings.