Yet another Project 2025 progression thread

[Poser]

Listen to yourself. You are basing everything you are saying on the worst possible outcome for you individually not on anything that has actually been stated or has actually happened. He was already president for 4 years. Did he sell off a single acre of public land in his first 4 years? The emotional intelligence it takes to be a democrat is 0.

Again, you are basing your conclusion on literal statements with no room for inference or interpretation. That’s a brave position. I do hope it works out for all of us.

Also, this first month of this presidency looks nothing like the first month of Trump’s previous presidency. He didn’t fire ~3,500 employees from the DOI last time either nor issue dozens of EOs in the first month. That’s a rather simplistic argument given how different the climate of this presidency is from the last one.

 

[Maverick1]

Look again it started in post #1. Would they/them make you feel better?

Doomed from the start. Hence the request above.

 

[PredatoronthePrairie]

Getting sick of all the doom and gloom talk.

Conservation grant funding has already started to open back up.

Some people just need to take a breath and count to 10.

 

[TaperPin]

Shame on people for fear mongering and telling half truths at the expense of our wild public lands! Shame! Facts are important. Actual good quality management is important. Truth is important, so to anyone making this a political argument shame on you - focus on facts. Shame on anyone who thinks little Donnie isn’t doing exactly what he was hired to do - he was voted in not despite his actions, but because of them. He is exactly who he has always been.

Many folks are extra sensitive when facts are uncomfortable. Maybe we can make an area just to coddle those that can’t stand fact checking, a safe place we can give virtual hugs and help them dust the sand out of their bikinis.

Man up - this year is just getting started. Talk is cheap - let’s focus on actual behaviors. Randomly taking out employees based on nothing other than their start date must be a best practice to someone - which business or business school stands behind randomly firing random people as a best practice? If someone is the best most capable manager why would they randomly fire people? It’s the choice that requires zero thought - it’s seems to be the opposite of smart thinking. If a consulting firm was hired to devise a plan for getting rid of poor performers in a large company and they cooked up this random plan they’d get sued for fraud.