Would you buy this scope?

[wind gypsy]

3-14 is great. Hell, SWFA 3-9 might as well be a 3.7-9 because of tunneling.

 

[keystone112]

3-14 suits me just fine. Can’t wait.

 

[Untamed]

YES

 

[teph45]

I have had the chance to look through that scope and its really nice.

 

[43.6N]

Shot in the dark here, but any chance this could be a reworked Leica model?
That would definitely check the trust box for me.

 

[bojangles808]

Shot in the dark here, but any chance this could be a reworked Leica model?
That would definitely check the trust box for me.

yea I wonder who the in to the Japanese OEM/whose name is going to be on it. feel like Leica might be a little too big a brand. my guess is Bushnell with a collaboration similar to what they did with GA precision with the LRHS2. they let GAP design the reticle (oops) and I think they are made at LOW . price point for the lrhs2 around that 1k ballpark and form generally had good things to say in the past about the lrhs/lrts. or maybe they just get Bushnell to put a UM or S2H logo on it instead. that's my guess for brand but Ryan does reeeaaally loves vortex so who knows...

 

[Wrangler13]

It’s got to be a huskemaw collab. I’ve never heard any negatives about their scopes reliability. Have heard their glass isn’t great but who cares. Their sales guy was posting on here asking what people wanted. Their prices seem fair enough too.

 

[8nbait]

Huskemaw glass is pretty bad except the 5-20.

Mil turret and MOA wind holds was pretty dumb also, but obviously this new scope wouldn’t have MOA anything.

Bushnell and GAP collaboration was good except the weight.

If this scope is…3-14, good glass, low profile, zero stop, elevation turret, capped windage, usable but uncluttered mil reticle and 20oz, as advertised most of us will be happy.

For me it will have to be pretty good to unseat the gen 2 SWFA 3-15 at as my go to scope under $1000.

 

[M0617]

Huskemaw glass is pretty bad except the 5-20.

Mil turret and MOA wind holds was pretty dumb also, but obviously this new scope wouldn’t have MOA anything.

Bushnell and GAP collaboration was good except the weight.

If this scope is…3-14, good glass, low profile, zero stop, elevation turret, capped windage, usable but uncluttered mil reticle and 20oz, as advertised most of us will be happy.

For me it will have to be pretty good to unseat the gen 2 SWFA 3-15 at as my go to scope under $1000.

Definitely agree. The Bushnell/GAP one was awesome and the weight was really the only downside.

 

[Grizzle]

I've said it before but my money is on huskemaw due to the Jarrod Millar connection and some talk of them reinvigorating the brand and new things coming.
Maven should have been willing and easy to work with if they were smart enough to realize how many rs1.2 rokslide was responsible for selling but it sounds like they are pretty clueless and the rs1.2 was good via luck more than intentional design

 

[atmat]

It’s obviously a Trij. All of yall are wrong. Trust me I know everything.

 

[HuntHarder]

Hate to ruin it for you guys, but its clearly a Leupold collab

 

[atmat]

Hate to ruin it for you guys, but its clearly a Leupold collab

I think Leupold are the most easy scopes to get behind, they’ve got a fantastic warranty, great mil discount, and easily re-sellable.

I would be absolutely thrilled if they built a robust scope. I’m sure many here would be.

 

[HuntHarder]

I think Leupold are the most easy scopes to get behind, they’ve got a fantastic warranty, great mil discount, and easily re-sellable.

I would be absolutely thrilled if they built a robust scope. I’m sure many here would be.

No doubt, that's why it's so obvious.