To police your fellow hunters as opposed to just going hunting and following the rules, believing in the concept that the other guys are decent and trying to follow the rules too? Really?
Life is pretty simple - you "Mind Your Own Business" and let others mind theirs. This has moral implications. It aint your or my job to monitor others and worry about every little thing they do. Decent folks don't do that.
Big picture here - we're on the internet and the internet police are out there pointing out anything everyone ever did that was "wrong" and ignoring their own actions. Sorry if the majority of folks don't seem to agree that we should police each other for pitiful little things.
Sure, we report real crimes - assault, robbery, drunk driving, murder, actual poaching of illegal animals, and leave the little nitpicky stuff alone.
Fish and Game and hunters are on the same side. The use vs. them is the argument that "hunters are a bunch of sniveling little snitches" you made earlier. In all areas of society, if you break a rule where you have no reasonable expectation of privacy, be an adult and take the consequences on the chin rather than whining.
When you chose not to "'Mind Your Own Business' and let others mind theirs" by chastising those who condemn unlawful actions, you showed how far from simple that principle actually is.
There is a balance that must be struck. The Fourth Amendment addresses this balance and there is a large body of law built around it. A simple explanation is that no one has a right to just dig for things you have done wrong, however if they come across it while doing what they are allowed to do then they have a right to address it. Like most simple explanations, this is not perfect. Interestingly enough, hunting is one of the primary areas where this does not apply in regards to law enforcement. A game warden can check your equipment without reasonable cause. There is good reason for this, however both legally (and I would argue ethically) this only applies to law enforcement that is specifically tasked with this, such as game wardens.
In short, I'm not going to try and police people, however if someone openly breaks a rule in front of me it is then my discretion on how to handle that. Of course this takes place within a complex web of competing rights along with the technicalities of the law (i.e. it would be unlawful and wrong if I chose to assault them for dropping a cigarette butt on the trail). While I personally don't report very many violations I observe, and strongly condemn busy bodies who self appoint themselves to the role of LE, I also support someone's right to report illegal activity they observe while going about their business.
Everything that the law defines as a crime is a "real crime." A better argument is serious crimes or crimes that endanger others.
People using LE to in the way you discussed in an earlier post is wrong, in most jurisdictions it is illegal, and if proven carries consequences for making a false report. There is a difference between good faith reporting of actions one believe to be unlawful and perjuring ones self to settle a score. Unfortunately it is very hard to prove what someone did or did not know when they made a report and it is rarely prosecuted even when both a false statement and malicious intent can be proven.
However, your argument that making an illegal shot by shooting from the road way is justified because it leads to a clean kill is irresponsible. Many laws are specifically intended to insure that hunting is more than just killing animals. You might as well argue that breaking Alaska law and using a helicopter to hunt is ok because it leads to meat on the ground or that illegal bating is ok as it makes a clean kill easier or that doping should be allowed in sports because it leads to winning. Such arguments completely miss the point of the law.
Big deal. He was off the road and out of the traffic, muzzle was on private or public and facing away from the road when it went off - not endangering anyone (which is the primary reason for the rule).
Hunters sure have become a bunch of sniveling little snitches.
Don't forget to call highway patrol on everyone that's speeding too.
I was hoping you wouldn't take the post personally - it was about the way folks treat things these days more than anything. It makes an us & them concept with other hunters.
Had a guy call LEO on me couple years ago on a duck hunt - he didn't like me setting up where I was (over 200 yds away and in a diff flight path) and how I accessed the spot (not thru his setup) - their biggest guy came over to rant and rave while shining a spotlight in our faces so we wouldn't recognize him (He's a fireman who's in love with his truck). So they are all pissed off over nothing more than us being there. Funny thing was that they were shooting 5 minutes before legal time (times are a big thing with duck hunting). Yet they used LEO to "punish" us with a cavity search back at the ramp. LOL! I pull the boat in with a 77 and an 80 yr old in there and the LEOs were very nice - asked for licenses, if we got birds, and how our day went. We all got along fine - no complaints, it was a great day, thanks for checking us kind of thing.
Why didn't I call LEO on them? If they were a little more blatant in their disregard for the laws, sure, but not for 5 minutes early - they know the risk of having a Federal agent watching them and it isn't my place to police the marsh/woods/roads for minor stuff - now drunk driving, obviously way over limit, etc are real issues and deserve a call.
Plus, I do volunteer work at the refuge and know that if folks complain and such, they make changes like removing hunt areas, reducing hunt opportunities, stuff like that. All cause some folks whine and complain if things aren't perfect for them.
That's what I see - folks being whiny and nit-picky, us vs them kind of stuff. That's what is being promoted online these days - have em arrested if they don't act just like "you" think they should. Don't know if you have kids but if you do and take em on a long distance drive, put em both in the back seat and you'll see what many online hunters sound like. Most guys in the field are decent.
It's my responsibility to know what I'm doing and where I'm at as opposed to worrying about others all the time.
Did you stop and talk to the guy after he shot the antelope? - ask him who owns the land and if he thought you could get permission (sly way of seeing if he's got access) and if he needs help loading up or getting a picture. Shooting 100 or 200 yards off a fence post means dead antelope and no tracking - especially the guys who know what they are doing and how to shoot.
That's all.