Fishermen0105
WKR
Solid rifles, just heavy for backpack hunting.
I think for the bigger calibers, weight of a m77 becomes less of an issue. Part of the reason i used an m77 for my 35 whelen was the weight. If memory serves its right at 8-8.5#, not sure if i would want it lighter.I picked up a matte stainless Hawkeye in .338 win mag about 2 years after Ruger launched them. Pour thing was marked down to $400 and needed a home. Put a bedded hogue stock on it and its a damn fine accurate rifle with 200 and 225 accubonds. Yes, gets a little heavy on long days, but such a fun gun to shoot. Feeds reliably and built solid. Kicks less with 200's than my 300 win does and is just efficient. Aftermarket stocks are limited for Rugers to a few companies. Hogue, Boyd's, HS Precision come to mind. My rifle is 9.5# with scope. To heavy for some but not much difference than some long range setups. Those 225's hit elk like thors hammer!
I think for the bigger calibers, weight of a m77 becomes less of an issue. Part of the reason i used an m77 for my 35 whelen was the weight. If memory serves its right at 8-8.5#, not sure if i would want it lighter.
Not Hawkeyes, but I have 3 77RL Ultra Lights in 243, 257 and 308, along with a 77RSI full stock in 250 Sav, all tangers. No complaints with any of them. They're not bench rest guns with their soda straw barrels, but all of them put the first cold bore shot exactly where intended. Light enough to be a pleasure to carry, (all are just a shade over 7# w/ Lewey VII2-7X33 glass), yet heavy enough to settle down for the shot. While beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I find them very pleasant to look at.
I don't like their integrated bases for mounting scopes to, and don't like their controlled feed with loading single shells at a time.
Controlled round feed means that the bolt grabs a round out of the magazine vs pushing it (tikka, m700 etc) there are some good articles and videos on the differences that explain it in better detail.What does that mean? The controlled feed part. I have an M77 but I'm not a gun guy. Most of the real detail stuff is lost on me.
My .270 only really likes 140gr and from what I've shot, the factory stuff from Nosler. I've gone higher and lower. The worst accuracy was HSM 130's.
I had mine rebored, only complaints I have is that it copper fouls worse than all of my other rifles, it will look like I melted a penny in the barrel after 20 shots. Also the barrel becomes pretty thin so it heats up more quickly. That being said, I am very happy with it and its accurate, can’t wait to hunt with it.I’m looking into getting an all weather Hawkeye 30-06 I have re bored or re barreled to a 35 whelen.
I hunt with the Hawkeye Alaskan in 375 Ruger. I love the short barrel for where we hunt in the thick brush. It is very accurate and has done great for me on moose, caribou, black bears and grizzly bears. Someone mentioned having an issue feeding a single round, I haven't had an issue. The claw extracture on mine is tapered and will close easily when dropping in a single shell. It isn't very light but I can't compare it to another rifle in 375. I did add an aftermarket trigger for fun even though I didn't have any problems with the original. I haven't bedded it but do reload for it and it may be my most accurate rifle.
I have these 77s in .243 and .270. You are right about throwing shots after 2-3 rounds. I love carrying that .270 in the mountains here. Just wish they were so finicky sighting in.Not Hawkeyes, but I have 3 77RL Ultra Lights in 243, 257 and 308, along with a 77RSI full stock in 250 Sav, all tangers. No complaints with any of them. They're not bench rest guns with their soda straw barrels, but all of them put the first cold bore shot exactly where intended. Light enough to be a pleasure to carry, (all are just a shade over 7# w/ Lewey VII2-7X33 glass), yet heavy enough to settle down for the shot. While beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I find them very pleasant to look at.