- Thread Starter
- #21
dennyking
FNG
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2021
- Messages
- 18
Yes, I'm in WA. I'm not really focused on a set budget, I mean I'd rather not spend 2k more on one if I can get near the same performance with a less expensive one. Right now I'm leaning pretty hard toward the Yoter model. I will add a scanner in the future, but I'm going to start with the scope. I may sell a couple guns sitting in the safe to pick up a scanner more quickly if I find just a scope to be a pain in the butt. Right now, I'm just using a wicked light setup and it works for some yote killing. I feel like the thermal is going to be a game changer though.My opinion hunting coyotes where I do, you wouldn’t kill more dogs with a Halo over a Yoter or a Yoter over an Iray, etc. I bet you would hardly kill more with any 640 unit over a 384. If it has a decent picture, the correct native mag, and holds zero that’s the important stuff. The best picture is just a bonus.
I feel like it’s better to have a clear scanner. You are looking through that the majority of the time not the sight. It would be annoying looking at fuzz except when you shoot. It’s like day hunting. I want my binos super clear. I want my scope to hold zero.
Dennyking you haven’t really stated a budget, distance of expected shot, etc. It almost sounds like you are in Washington. My personal opinion is that it sucks hunting coyotes without a scanner. So I would factor that into the budget.
For me 125-225 yards seems to be the sweet spot to shoot. For that distance I like 3x+ native mag. The bigger FOV the better. If you don’t hunt a lot an LRF would be nice.
I suggest you look at the upper end 384 units and a 640 scanner.