These are 3 five shot groups I just did this afternoon (fire forming to AI)
Off sandbag and picnic table. As solid as I will ever get.
A little barrel mirage shooting the final 5 but not much
I shot 5, walked up to target & back. Reload mag, shoot, repeat
If I'd quit with the first 5 I could fool myself into thinking I have a
3/8 moa gun. Well, maybe I do. But probably I don't.
Either way, until the gun learns to shoot itself there's no way
to know just how precise it might be because I'm in the equation.
As long as I'm the trigger man it won't shoot any better than I'm able.
I think it's fair to say that applies to most everyone.
The first round of the second group is the outlier. My position was
not good. I reset myself and continued.
I see nothing wrong with shooting multiple 3-shot groups; just overlay them
so you can see what your 9 or twelve or 30 shot group is to get a realistic
example of your actual cone of fire.
Besides, how can you zero a rifle properly on a 3-shot group?
If me and my hunting round can keep a ten shot group in 1 1/4" under perfect
conditions ( bench/sandbags) I'm satisfied. The bullet and velocity are more important to me than bughole precision. So then if I can shoot </= 2 1/2 moa under field conditions
I feel pretty confident .
That's not to say I won't keep playing around with powder, seating depths, etc.
looking for that "magic" load.
View attachment 1084281View attachment 1084282View attachment 1084283