thinhorn_AK
"DADDY"
I have a TBAC 7 on the way, I bought it mostly out of boredom.
Functionally none of them are, what do you mean by hearing safe?The TBAC 5 can barely be considered a can at all, and it is nowhere close to hearing safe.
Same but a magnus.I have a TBAC 7 on the way, I bought it mostly out of boredom.
I agree with this comment 100%, the 5 is a borderline gimmick. This coming from a big TBAC fan.The TBAC 5 can barely be considered a can at all, and it is nowhere close to hearing safe.
Functionally none of them are, what do you mean by hearing safe?
Surprising about the ultra 5. I really want one specifically in 6.5 aperture for dedicated 223 use. Wonder if it would be good on a smaller powder column.
Only going to save me a couple inches and a couple ounces over the 7 that’s already on there though.m
I’d also like to try a Hyperion K but they need to get rid of that sig taper first.
Rex silentium mg7k in .264. Would I get one again? Yes, but only cause I think their cool lol. They aren’t worth the cost or hassle if your only goal is hunting. Consider the trade offs.
Hunting with suppressor: heavier (usually about 3/4-1lb), middle of the road recoil managment aka not as good as a break but better than an open muzzle, just barely hearing safe but I still wear ear pro because they are still LOUD!
Hunting with ear plugs: run a break for the best recoil managment, don’t forget earplugs at home, nearly weightless.
I run an MAE suppressor which is a similar volume to the Ultra 5 and I could not imagine running it on a .308 size cartridge, its just too small to make much difference.Surprising about the ultra 5. I really want one specifically in 6.5 aperture for dedicated 223 use. Wonder if it would be good on a smaller powder column.
Only going to save me a couple inches and a couple ounces over the 7 that’s already on there though.m
I’d also like to try a Hyperion K but they need to get rid of that sig taper first.
I used to use an optimus micro on my 223 bolt gun, that’s 5” and around 1.3” diameter. It’s not as quiet as my bigger cans but was way better than bare muzzle.I run an MAE suppressor which is a similar volume to the Ultra 5 and I could not imagine running it on a .308 size cartridge, its just too small to make much difference.
However you're on the right track thinking of using it on a .223, while mine isn't as quiet as larger volume suppressors, it is a noticeable reduction in noise and I much prefer the more compact suppressor.
If I'm bench shooting I still wear plugs, for hunting where I only fire maybe a half doz shots I feel its fine, no ringing ears afterwards
I find it strange when people show up at the range or hunting with just muffs shooting a braked magnum. Things still as loud as bare muzzle with the muffs.Even with plugs and muffs, most muzzle brakes are not hearing safe.
I find it strange when people show up at the range or hunting with just muffs shooting a braked magnum. Things still as loud as bare muzzle with the muffs.
I think any suppressor is better than none.
Side note I wish steel matches would do suppressor only squads. I’d get rid of my brakes tomorrow.
That would be great. Generally with plugs, muffs and mild cartridges I’m fine after a day of 100 braked shots, I also wear sealed safety glasses for the whole shoot. What kills me is I end up spotting for someone and get blasted a bunch. Until now Iv been using a brake as a crutch for shooting a little bigger and lighter gun but that might change next year.Suppressor only diversions.
Again, I don't even know what you mean by hearing safe. What decibel number does that translate to at shooter's ear and for how many shots? And if you're talking about 1-2 shots on a hunt then even an Ultra-5 qualifies given it's right around 130 db at shooter's ear for a 6.5CM as an example. I'm genuinely curious because I own TBAC Ultra 5/7/9, 22-TD, and 338 Ultra. I can tell you from actual experience a 5 is fine for 1-2 shots on a hunt.There absolutely are hearing safe suppressors.
Again, I don't even know what you mean by hearing safe. What decibel number does that translate to at shooter's ear and for how many shots? And if you're talking about 1-2 shots on a hunt then even an Ultra-5 qualifies given it's right around 130 db at shooter's ear for a 6.5CM as an example. I'm genuinely curious because I own TBAC Ultra 5/7/9, 22-TD, and 338 Ultra. I can tell you from actual experience a 5 is fine for 1-2 shots on a hunt.
I'm very aware of how hearing loss works. Thunderbeast's website and actual measurements on video show 133 dbs for a .308 at shooter's ear. Unless you're hunting with other people near the front of your barrel or have figured out how to fire your rifle with your ear a couple feet to the left/right of the muzzle (where your measurement number comes from since it's mil-spec), then what you are saying has no basis in reality.The standard from OSHA is 140dBs for infrequent sounds- a couple of shots hunting. The TBAC Ultra 5 is above 140dB with a 308. If the Ultra 5 was free and was for a very, very niche use with a very small capacity cartridge… maybe. Paying a $200 stamp and using in general center fire cartridges? No.
Your ears not ringing is not a sign of hearing safe.
I'm very aware of how hearing loss works. Thunderbeast's website and actual measurements on video show 133 dbs for a .308 at shooter's ear. Unless you're hunting with other people near the front of your barrel or have figured out how to fire your rifle with your ear a couple feet to the left/right of the muzzle (where your measurement number comes from since it's mil-spec), then what you are saying has no basis in reality.
I’m not sure why anyone buys cans that aren’t “hearing safe” I put hearing safe in quotes because as people started diving into, it’s more complicated then a simple decibel reading. It’s a logarithmic scale, exponentially more power, exposure time, different frequencies, yadda yadda yadda.Quite a few suppressors are impact hearing safe on most rifles.
Even with plugs and muffs, most muzzle brakes are not hearing safe.