What bincoculars do you use?

Joined
Jan 9, 2026
Messages
18
What binoculars does everyone use or recommend?

I am looking for a new set and I’ve looked through a handful just in the stores, but it’s nothing like being outside in all different lights and terrain to know what you like.

Only thing I am picky about is lifetime warranty. I’ve had Swarovski, insanely good glass but the 2 year warranty is a bummer for me. I am really hard on stuff.

What’s everyone’s thoughts on Mavens or Sig Saur?
 
What binoculars does everyone use or recommend?

I am looking for a new set and I’ve looked through a handful just in the stores, but it’s nothing like being outside in all different lights and terrain to know what you like.

Only thing I am picky about is lifetime warranty. I’ve had Swarovski, insanely good glass but the 2 year warranty is a bummer for me. I am really hard on stuff.

What’s everyone’s thoughts on Mavens or Sig Saur?
Maven B series for me. Definetly not Sig.

The only reason I would buy anything other than Maven is if I wanted range finding binos, and if I did I would buy Leicas.

Sent from my SM-S931U using Tapatalk
 
The maven B series are solid for their price range. I’ve ran the B6 12x50’s for the last 3 years when in more open country and I have no complaints on the glass. The multi piece armoring I’m not sold on. It peeled off at the objective bells on mine twice, went back to the Wyoming for the first time for repair, then just glued them back on myself the second time. Electrical tape is a quick field fix to keep the main armoring from peeling if it happens 🤣

If I could only have one though, it’d still be old school swaro EL’s.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7883.png
    IMG_7883.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 18
Despite living a couple hours from the warehouse that maven uses to redistribute binoculars they import, I will not buy another pair from them because the customer service times are long and they will not support local dealers. I simply do not care to pay the ship back and forth and guess what I want from a webpage game.

On a more personal level, Maven is expensive for the range they are in, have odd glass sizes, and I really hate the ugly color of them. It might be a learned trait from getting screwed out of money from them, but the matt charcoal with the glossy orange makes me want to puke when I see it.

Vortex has been good to me.

If your hunting under 200 yards you wont benefit much from anything better than diamondback. Out to 500 wouldnt bother with anything else.

For a quality glass that can distinguish tree branches at 3,000 yards, ive been happy with the fury hd 5000. The range finder on it was a huge upgrade from the sig kilo bdx i previously had. Not many people need to see past 500 yards hunting.

The vipers are a little bit less contrast than fury hd but still better than needed for most hunters. I have a pair thats my loaner pair.

I really like the kaibabs for long range viewing tripod only. Also great for looking for star formations. The glass is just under the razor line, better than most mid level spotting scopes on the market, and having 3x the field of view of a spotter with a 56mm objective on each eye is very bright and very fast to find deer at 4 miles. Few people will ever need that.

Of course most people are biased by looks or what their friends use when it comes to optics. The only thing scientific about what optic you need is people with poor vision will for sure need higher quality optics to see the same as someone with excellent vision using a lesser optic.

Really you need to decide what ranges you want to see a given size of animal, and that tells you magnification, whether you want to identify them or appreciate the details of their fur or feathers tell you how good of glass to buy. Ive killed dozens of deer without binoculars or rifle scopes, yet i wont go a mile from my house without good binoculars these days.
 
I've been using the Maven b.5 18x56 for the past 4 years or so and have been really happy with them. I like big glass though.

I've been thinking about upgrading to the swaro 14x52's, but have a hard time justifying the price, because I'm mostly satisfied with the Mavens. But idk what I'm missing.
 
I have set of Swarovski SLC 15x56, they are really clear but I’ve looked through mavens and they seemed about the same maybe a little clearer.

Is there a significant difference between the SLC and NL?
 
Ive been using Leica 10×42 Ultravids for about 20 years now. Best glass ive ever used. They just seem to work for my eyes better than the rest of what I call the big three. Leica, Zeiss, and Swarovski are all great binoculars. My " big three"! Others are getting close but I dont believe they are there yet. Try a bunch if you can. I bought mine at Cabelas after taking about a dozen different binoculars outside , accompanied of course! Leica also had an unconditional lifetime warranty when I bought mine. At least my owners card says lifetime warranty. I think its 30 years now. Good luck with your search.
 
I’ve been using Vortex for about seven or eight years now, and they work well for me.
Especially at their price point and lifetime warranty.
I have two pair of the Diamondback HDs, 8x32, and 10x42.
I use the 8x32s the most, and could get by with just those probably, if I had to pick just one.
I would like to add that I’m a northeast hunter so the circumstances may be different for others and their needs as hunters in their areas.
 
Back
Top