WGF Updated DRAFT Regulations

For the life of me I cannot understand increasing or keeping tag allocations the same when herd numbers are 40%-60% of the desired objective.

We know WHY they do it… greed, selfishness of $$$.

You would think the biologists and wildlife managers would fight this.
 
For the life of me I cannot understand increasing or keeping tag allocations the same when herd numbers are 40%-60% of the desired objective.

We know WHY they do it… greed, selfishness of $$$.

You would think the biologists and wildlife managers would fight this.
There are several units that are over objective. Ask those biologist you mentioned. They’re the ones making the recommendations, correct?
 
Actually Dax had some comments and after listening to them I have no complaints against Wagonhound.
He had numbers and good constructive ideas that they listened too and several other LOs agreed and some did disagree. They all want that area to be a trophy bull area again and they want more smaller bulls taken to take pressure off the older class bulls.
 
Actually Dax had some comments and after listening to them I have no complaints against Wagonhound.
He had numbers and good constructive ideas that they listened too and several other LOs agreed and some did disagree. They all want that area to be a trophy bull area again and they want more smaller bulls taken to take pressure off the older class bulls.
Wasn't the recent addition of Type 2 tags limited to raghorns an idea that originated from Wagonhound to reduce busted antlers on the big boys?
Did Wagonhound offer raghorn hunts? I don't see anything on their website.
 
I'm sorry... I looked and looked... where are the proposed quotas for 2025?
Scroll down to the animal of your choice.

 
Back
Top