Weatherby or Bergara?

Joined
Nov 30, 2024
Messages
5
Hello,

I am looking at purchasing a rifle and I am stuck between the Weatherby Mark V Live Wild and the Bergara Ridge Carbon Wilderness. I would have already purchased a Tikka Roughtec but they do not have 7 PRC or 280 AI.

I will be using this rifle to hunt whitetail deer in a blind and Elk in the mountains and anything in between. My main concern with the Weatherby is the barrel length and the main concern with the Bergara is I heard the action is better on the Mark V.

Live Wild .280 AI - 5.8 lbs 24” barrel 1/9 twist
Ridge C 7 PRC - 6.7 lbs 22” barrel 1/8 twist
Live Wild 7 PRC - 6.8 lbs 24” barrel 1/8 twist

I will be adding at least a 2” muzzle bake. Thanks for all the input!
 
OP
C
Joined
Nov 30, 2024
Messages
5
Also, I am leaning towards the 7 PRC due to ammo availability and it’s about $10 cheaper a box. I do not reload ammo (at least not yet)
 

nobody

WKR
Joined
Sep 15, 2020
Messages
2,121
Not a huge Weatherby rifle fan (though one day I’ll own a 257 weatherby mag, for no reason other than I want it…), but you couldn’t gift me a bergara with a gun to my head. They have a track record, and not a great one. Lots of known issues with their ability to perform and to actually function as they’re supposed to. Just google “bergara rifle problems” and read away. Add on the known shortcomings of the Remington 700 footprint and barf.
 

270quest

WKR
Joined
Jan 31, 2017
Messages
720
Location
Boise, Idaho
I have to do some more research and really dig in because I don’t know a lot about the Bergara (good and bad) but yesterday I handled a crest carbon at Scheels. Man that rifle has a lot going for it. The carbon stock was the real deal!!
 
OP
C
Joined
Nov 30, 2024
Messages
5
Not a huge Weatherby rifle fan (though one day I’ll own a 257 weatherby mag, for no reason other than I want it…), but you couldn’t gift me a bergara with a gun to my head. They have a track record, and not a great one. Lots of known issues with their ability to perform and to actually function as they’re supposed to. Just google “bergara rifle problems” and read away. Add on the known shortcomings of the Remington 700 footprint and barf.
Wow really? I had no idea. I watched a lot of Backfire TV and that guy is pretty happy with Bergara. Thanks for your input. I’ll look into it.
 

H80Hunter

WKR
Joined
Sep 26, 2020
Messages
879
Yeah I’ve had bad experiences with Bergara as well. Good customer service but the second rifle was just as problem laden as the first one. I doubt they’re all bad, but I’ve seen enough from my end.
 

flyboy214

FNG
Joined
Feb 14, 2021
Messages
68
I have two Mark V weatherbys and I can recommend them. Both were easy to setup and shot factory ammo within my normal accuracy range. (.9-1.3 MOA) One is a big dumb 6.5-300 that weighs 7.2 lbs with the scope and sometimes surprises me by shooting 4 rounds in a clover. If I have cleaned them, both of my Weatherby rifles like 7-10 fouling shots before the really good groups come back.

Overall, I really like the trigger, short bolt throw and their carbon stocks from peak 44. I would not worry about the polymer stock on the live wild. Tikka has proven that polymer can be accurate. As long as you like the stock geometry, I'd say you should go for it.

Scope mounting on the 6-lug action is less fiddly than on the 9-lug action because of the shorter distance. With the 6-lugs, you can use the peak 44 rail and fit a Trijicon 2.5-15x42. I highly recommend the peak 44 rail. On my 9-lug action, I had to use the Talley mounts and lapp them.

The 280ai would put you in the 6-lug action, giving you some wiggle room on scope weight while keeping overall weight down.
 
Top