What is the difference between the non HD and the new 2012 HD?
Is the new HD that better??
It is a totally differenct design from eyepiece to prism to housing. By all accounts it should perform better.
What is the difference between the non HD and the new 2012 HD?
Is the new HD that better??
That article is going into a magazine for Vortex and I was not able to post it up on Rokslide yet Sorry
Here's the quick version....
I tried to stay out of the testing as much as I could for the first couple weeks (with the Razor HD's). That doesn't mean I didn't use them, I just didn't compare them to anything right of the bat.
I had 10 friends compare the 10x42 Razor to several other optics.
Zeiss Victory FL
Swaro SLC
Swaro EL
Leupold Gold Ring
Brunton Icon
Zeiss Conquest
Meopta Meo HD
The Razor finished up in a tie for 2nd out of all the contestants and that was mostly because of extreme low light differences.
In my testing I found close to the same results as the others and would rate these as "best bang for the buck" out of any optic on the market.
If you put them side by side to a set of Swaro SLC's, you would not know the difference and the same could be said with the Zeiss FL's.
When I first used them I thought I may be talking myself into how good they are and that's why I wanted to get as many people involved in the testing as possible.
Everyones eyes are different and some prefer different brands over other. I prefer Zeiss over Swaro, so I wanted to make sure I had a decent amount of Swaro guys use the Razor.