Vertical stringing, how much does powder charge matter

[rickyw]

Here’s a group I recently shot with my 375 H&H. I’m wondering how much of this, if any, may be due to the load? I’m shooting a Speer 270 grain boat tail loaded to 3.6”. Unfortunately I cannot load longer because the magazine is 3.6”, but it’s quite a ways off the lands.
I’ve tried multiple powders and they all shot terrible with this bullet (no vertical string, just all over 3.5-4 MOA). CFE 223 shot the best, but produced the stringing. I wanted to use this Speer because it’s about the softest bullet you can get for expansion at a bit longer range. So below, is the group from 76 grains CFE 223. I essentially duplicated this group again 2 days ago. Would working through a few different charges have a chance at a reducing this amount of stringing? Or, I’m on to another bullet. Thanks

PS, rifle is a classic stainless model 70. Bought it on consignment earlier this year. Appears very lightly used. I put it in a stockys carbon fiber stock, torqued to 50 inch pounds. It is not yet bedded.

 

[Q_Sertorius]

Assuming this is a 100-yard group, I think it’s something in the way you are controlling the rifle. At least that’s what other people have told me about groups with vertical stringing like that.

 

[rickyw]

Assuming this is a 100-yard group, I think it’s something in the way you are controlling the rifle. At least that’s what other people have told me about groups with vertical stringing like that.

I’ve wondered that as well but I’ve had that looked at by an instructor while i shot this rifle with this load. So, I’m setting that variable aside for the moment while asking this question…

And it may be nothing to do with the load, but I wanted to explore that possibility a bit

 

[UPThunderbolt]

Here’s a group I recently shot with my 375 H&H. I’m wondering how much of this, if any, may be due to the load? I’m shooting a Speer 270 grain boat tail loaded to 3.6”. Unfortunately I cannot load longer because the magazine is 3.6”, but it’s quite a ways off the lands.
I’ve tried multiple powders and they all shot terrible with this bullet (no vertical string, just all over 3.5-4 MOA). CFE 223 shot the best, but produced the stringing. I wanted to use this Speer because it’s about the softest bullet you can get for expansion at a bit longer range. So below, is the group from 76 grains CFE 223. I essentially duplicated this group again 2 days ago. Would working through a few different charges have a chance at a reducing this amount of stringing? Or, I’m on to another bullet. Thanks

PS, rifle is a classic stainless model 70. Bought it on consignment earlier this year. Appears very lightly used. I put it in a stockys carbon fiber stock, torqued to 50 inch pounds. It is not yet bedded.
View attachment 952152

A friend bought a new .300 wm Tikka and had the scope mounted at Cabelas. While developing a load for it, we ran into a similar group pattern. Scope mounts and action bolts were all loose. After torquing them down, the vertical string grouping went away.

 

[rickyw]

A friend bought a new .300 wm Tikka and had the scope mounted at Cabelas. While developing a load for it, we ran into a similar group pattern. Scope mounts and action bolts were all loose. After torquing them down, the vertical string grouping went away.

I could always recheck but I used a torque wrench on everything, torque to spec, except the Warne mountain tech ring screws are torqued to 25 inch pounds. Loctite on the base screws. SWFA scope

 

[UPThunderbolt]

I’m a long way from being an expert, but if your rifle has a free floating recoil lug, I would also check to make sure it is properly seated. I’ve run into that issue a couple times.

 

[Odd1out]

I would check everything stated above again and also look for a cracked ring. Generally they crack near the weakest part which is the screws. U could run the torque wrench a few times on the screws. A hair line crack will show up as you check a few times and start having to re torque.

Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk

 

[rickyw]

Will recheck. Thank you