Greenbelt
Lil-Rokslider
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2023
- Messages
- 158
What does any of that matter? The fact of the matter is whether 99% of road hunters voted for that or not, it is undeniable that the law has benefited animal populations, and the forest itself. And this argument about forest management and fire prevention is trash. I was raised in the mountains where the fire management was non existent and these were all areas where vehicles were allowed to go in (so all the sudden cause the laws rescinded the Governments gonna actually work?) IDK at what point ppl are gonna figure out the Government is not our friend. Nothing they do is for your benefit. NOTHING. Trump is attempting to turn our land into a money making scheme at the behest of all of us. Those lands are the last place in this country I don't have to see road hunters with 3-4 in a truck driving in circles waiting to run a deer over. Its the last place in this country with the idea of the unknown. Its the last true adventure and the fact that this is even a discussion (hunters included) shows where this generation and this country is at.True , I was trying to set a baseline on where I’d like to see the management get to .
What’s interesting is pondering what was the nexus of the roadless rule ?
What special interests pushed for it ?
What masters did it serve ?
Was it budget related because in the 25 years pre roadless rule the usfs became a special interest driven agency that could only hemorrhage $ ?
Well I can gaurantee you 99% of hunters or true outdoorsmen were not advocating for this rule when it was adopted . Why on earth are we expected to defend it when it is finally removed ?