Unknown suppressors OG testing

[Formidilosus]

I’d be interested in a comparison of the OG 6.5 vs Triple 6 on a 6 UM

Soon.

 

[cuerro viejo]

Except:
A: you bought the first suppressor from a company you knew would be developing more

B: this probably isn’t the Predator, but matches the general specs on the roadmap, so this type of can isn’t a surprise to anyone who’s paid attention

C: the OG is everything it was marketed as

and my post history on OG says that exact same thing and that it is and was everything it was advertised. I like my OG, already has over 1k rounds, it is only can I trust to really hard abuse.

US did tell me via email they weren’t planning on going to a 6 or 6.5 specific OG when I ordered, I get innovation happens, and I’m happy with my OG, but I’d be happier if it was just the current 6.5 OG specs but who wouldn’t , I do think the 6.5 OG will spec out better then this new one though. I’m ordering one or the other as soon as final comparison specs get release

 

[Schmo]

and my post history on OG says that exact same thing and that it is and was everything it was advertised. I like my OG, already has over 1k rounds, it is only can I trust to really hard abuse.

US did tell me via email they weren’t planning on going to a 6 or 6.5 specific OG when I ordered, I get innovation happens, and I’m happy with my OG, but I’d be happier if it was just the current 6.5 OG specs but who wouldn’t , I do think the 6.5 OG will spec out better then this new one though. I’m ordering one or the other as soon as final comparison specs get release

Yeah I get ya. I do find it interesting that this Triple 6 matches the specs of the Predator on their roadmap, but this one seems to not be the Predator. I wonder what will distinguish them.

 

[Formidilosus]

Yeah I get ya. I do find it interesting that this Triple 6 matches the specs of the Predator on their roadmap, but this one seems to not be the Predator. I wonder what will distinguish them.

It is the can that was going to be the Predator.

 

[Timjohnson11]

Soon.

Form - can you get your hands on an Airlock ZG 6.5 to add to this comparison?

 

[Formidilosus]

Form - can you get your hands on an Airlock ZG 6.5 to add to this comparison?

I will eval whatever can companies want to send for the most part- just like the scope evals.

 

[wind gypsy]

Glitch in the site! The page was showing 8 on your actual post. After I quoted you, I saw the quote said 6. So I went back up to your post, and it still said 8. So I refreshed the page and everything lined out.

I saw that too. Was wondering what the catch was.. Less reflex volume than OG 6.5 but heavier wouldn't have made it very attractive.

 

[Stache Attack]

Hoping I can swap my Rokslide order or maybe I’ll just buy another can oops.

This seems to be the perfect can

 

[Formidilosus]

I will post the full results when US decides if this Triple 6 is the final design, however-

6cm, 18”
Avg: 131.7 dB(A)


22CM, 20”
Avg: 130.2 dB(A)


223, 18”
Avg: 129.1 dB(A)

This design has about 1-1.5 dB(A) of FRP which makes those numbers higher with only three shots than 10+. At 10 shots the average for all three was noticeably lower.

Like all US cans so far, durability, barrel length restrictions, and rate of fire are basically not functionally limited.

 

[Schmo]

I will post the full results when US decides if this Triple 6 is the final design, however-

6cm, 18”
Avg: 131.7 dB(A)


22CM, 20”
Avg: 130.2 dB(A)


223, 18”
Avg: 129.1 dB(A)

This design has about 1-1.5 dB(A) of FRP which makes those numbers higher with only three shots than 10+. At 10 shots the average for all three was noticeably lower.

Like all US cans so far, durability, barrel length restrictions, and rate of fire are basically not functionally limited.

Loving those specs in such a small light can!

 

[omicron1792]

I will post the full results when US decides if this Triple 6 is the final design, however-

6cm, 18”
Avg: 131.7 dB(A)


22CM, 20”
Avg: 130.2 dB(A)


223, 18”
Avg: 129.1 dB(A)

This design has about 1-1.5 dB(A) of FRP which makes those numbers higher with only three shots than 10+. At 10 shots the average for all three was noticeably lower.

Like all US cans so far, durability, barrel length restrictions, and rate of fire are basically not functionally limited.

Still 5/8 thread?

 

[Formidilosus]

Still 5/8 thread?

Correct.

 

[Tbuckus]

I will post the full results when US decides if this Triple 6 is the final design, however-

6cm, 18”
Avg: 131.7 dB(A)


22CM, 20”
Avg: 130.2 dB(A)


223, 18”
Avg: 129.1 dB(A)

This design has about 1-1.5 dB(A) of FRP which makes those numbers higher with only three shots than 10+. At 10 shots the average for all three was noticeably lower.

Like all US cans so far, durability, barrel length restrictions, and rate of fire are basically not functionally limited.

Appreciate the intel. The T6 sounds like it would be even better for my lightweight 6ARC. I hope you get your hands on an Airlock for comparison. Heard they may be coming out with a 6mm can also.

 

[Escalante11]

I will post the full results when US decides if this Triple 6 is the final design, however-

6cm, 18”
Avg: 131.7 dB(A)


22CM, 20”
Avg: 130.2 dB(A)


223, 18”
Avg: 129.1 dB(A)

This design has about 1-1.5 dB(A) of FRP which makes those numbers higher with only three shots than 10+. At 10 shots the average for all three was noticeably lower.

Like all US cans so far, durability, barrel length restrictions, and rate of fire are basically not functionally limited.

Does anyone know how this compares to the OG65?

 

[T_Widdy]

Does anyone know how this compares to the OG65?

Thread 'US OG65 eval'

Sep 13, 2025

I will post more about the reason for the different events as time permits. For now, the information that I have.




6.5 CM, 20” barrel, Hornady 140gr ELD-M

OG65 averaged 129.5 dBA SE



Control TBAC UL7 Gen 2 averaged 129.2 dBA SE



7 PRC, 20” barrel, Hornady 160gr CX:

NOTE: The OG65 is not sold as a 7mm can. However, there was sufficient clearance with this rifle and bore.

OG65 averaged 132.5 dBA SE



Control TBAC UL7 Gen 2 averaged 133.2 dBA SE
...

• Formidilosus
• Replies: 0
• Forum: Suppressors

• 

 

[wind gypsy]

Interesting. So the 666 actually metered better on the 18" 223 than the OG 65.

 

[Formidilosus]

Interesting. So the 666 actually metered better on the 18" 223 than the OG 65.

+/- 2 dB day to day. You can not take the absolute meter numbers as gospel- it varies day to day up to at least 2 dB due to environmental conditions. Hell I had the TBAC UL7 Gen 2 average 136 dB a week ago and just stopped testing that day. The next day with the exact same gun, can, same ammo in the mag, etc- back to 131 dB(A).

So far the Triple 6 seems to be about 1 dB louder than the OG65 on average.