Unknown suppressors OG testing

[HuntHarder]

I'll agree that them talking about testing a 7mm in the og6.5, doesn't mean its a 7mm can. US is very transparent, almost to a fault.

 

[AZ_Hunter]

You also haven’t been in the silencer game long enough to realize 90 percent of silencer companies make BS claims . You prolly don’t even know about JJFU and his 98 DB claims from 10 years ago . But that’s the point , there’s no standardized testing so there’s no way to prove their silencer didn’t test at a certain DB , under certain conditions , with specific ammo , on a bluebird day . How would anybody ever sue and win like that ?

Oh God, JJ’s infamous football can. What a joke that was. I remember that.

 

[Timjohnson11]

Ok then if it’s not functional/rated for 7mm then someone from UM or (unofficially) Form should objectively state that. It’s been a key input addressed behind my whole question here in the first place, and to this point no1 from UM (including Form) have refuted and corrected this understanding if wrong.

Is the OG 6.5 it functional/rated for 7mm (despite being optimized for 6.5mm)?

Or is it objectively NOT functional/rated for 7mm? and that point will be made clear in product disclaimers?

 

[RWT]

Ok then if it’s not functional/rated for 7mm then someone from UM or (unofficially) Form should objectively state that. It’s been a key input addressed behind my whole question here in the first place, and to this point no1 from UM (including Form) have refuted and corrected this understanding if wrong.

Is the OG 6.5 it functional/rated for 7mm (despite being optimized for 6.5mm)?

Or is it objectively NOT functional/rated for 7mm? and that point will be made clear in product disclaimers?

If the box says 6.5 projectile. I am sticking with a 6.5 projectile. The fact I can stuff 10lbs of crap in a 5 lb bag doesn’t mean it is safe to do so. I am not risking my life or handsome looks based on some dipstick posting an internet video.

 

[waspocrew]

Ok then if it’s not functional/rated for 7mm then someone from UM or (unofficially) Form should objectively state that. It’s been a key input addressed behind my whole question here in the first place, and to this point no1 from UM (including Form) have refuted and corrected this understanding if wrong.

Is the OG 6.5 it functional/rated for 7mm (despite being optimized for 6.5mm)?

Or is it objectively NOT functional/rated for 7mm? and that point will be made clear in product disclaimers?

I wouldn’t chance a 7mm through it “under the right conditions”. If your threads aren’t perfectly aligned, it sounds like you’ll have a bad day.

 

[Moccasin]

It also disincentivizes the hell out of those guys getting a .223 can to market ASAP

So, let me get this straight...these guys iterate like crazy, come up with a better product in weeks that would have taken a year or two before...

...and people are pissed that they offered it up as soon as they could?

Yes sir. And to think, as a result of this forum and the associated companies, in the last couple of years we now have rings, stocks, turn-key rifles, multiple suppressors, shooting aids, a pack, and a shooting school. The future will see a scope and a new action. All geared towards hunters. If you ask me, the issue with iteration isn’t on the side of UM, it’s on the side of hunters.

 

[Formidilosus]

Ok then if it’s not functional/rated for 7mm then someone from UM or (unofficially) Form should objectively state that. It’s been a key input addressed behind my whole question here in the first place, and to this point no1 from UM (including Form) have refuted and corrected this understanding if wrong.

Is the OG 6.5 it functional/rated for 7mm (despite being optimized for 6.5mm)?

Or is it objectively NOT functional/rated for 7mm? and that point will be made clear in product disclaimers?

IT IS A 6.5mm CAN.

At no point has anyone stated that it is a 7mm can. ALL US cans are tested or proofed beyond what they are rated for- do you actually think the OG is a 33xc can just because one was proofed through it?
It’s hard to see whether you are constantly trolling, or actually can’t grasp all of this.

The 6.5mm OG is a 6.5mm can. Yes, it is possible if everything is perfect to shoot .277 or 7mm maybe. The 30cal of is also larger than .308- it is possible to shoot a larger bore through it. Not recommended- but possible.

 

[IrkedCitizen]

I still think an original release OG with a 338 bore for a 16" 338arc bolt gun would be awesome.

 

[Dobermann]

I have a radical suggestion for y'all ...

Keep your 30 cal cans for ... 30 cal rifles. Be happy.

Buy a 6.5 cal can for ... 6.5 rifles. Be happy.

And if @Unknown Suppressors come out with a .223 can ... buy one for .223 rifles. Be happy,

Better yet ... buy (whatever-appropriately-sized-as-you-see-it) cans for every single rifle you have. Be happy.

Problem solved.