Unknown suppressors OG testing

Have you had an opportunity to try the OG on your MK12? Curios about the fit and sound comparison with the AEM5. Thanks

Yes. It sounds good as a straight OG on the MK12. A couple dBA louder than a AEM5.
They also made an OG with a HUB backend, and I used a HUB PRI mount in it. It was noticeably better sounding than the AEM30k on the MK12. Needs to be metered but the OG PRI setup sounds really good.
 
Yes. It sounds good as a straight OG on the MK12. A couple dBA louder than a AEM5.
They also made an OG with a HUB backend, and I used a HUB PRI mount in it. It was noticeably better sounding than the AEM30k on the MK12. Needs to be metered but the OG PRI setup sounds really good.
Thank you
 
Yes. It sounds good as a straight OG on the MK12. A couple dBA louder than a AEM5.
They also made an OG with a HUB backend, and I used a HUB PRI mount in it. It was noticeably better sounding than the AEM30k on the MK12. Needs to be metered but the OG PRI setup sounds really good.

As in you had 4"ish of barrel turned down in front of the PRI mount?
 
No. I’m not sure what you mean.

Because words are hard for me.. I'm basically referring to the "Option B" diagram from the below post, only with the PRI adapter at back of the can. (after posting that it strikes me that maybe i should get more familiar with the PRI adapter..):
This is exactly what I was PM'ing you about doing! I even sketched up about what it would look like... It would even double as a full 8" can for shooters that don't want to get a custom barrel cut, so the market for US would be wider. And it doesn't have to be installed by a gunsmith.

View attachment 908232

For some quick math... this would increase the reflex expansion chamber volume by around 37% over the OG while not changing the form factor and reducing weight. You could shorten the reflex by an inch and achieve the same internal reflex volume as the OG.
View attachment 908246
 
Because words are hard for me.. I'm basically referring to the "Option B" diagram from the below post, only with the PRI adapter at back of the can. (after posting that it strikes me that maybe i should get more familiar with the PRI adapter..):

Oh no. The MK12 uses a PRI muzzle brake and a collar on the barrel for the backend of the can.

IMG_0433.jpeg
 
I have the extreme 2.0 and the in ear buds and have been plenty happy with them.

What bad experiences have you had with them?

I’ve had the extremes for 3-4 years with no issues.
Very heavy conduction noise through the connecting wire that makes them at worst unusable for hearing students and at best very annoying to suffer through.

I have not tried the individual buds.

-J
 
Very heavy conduction noise through the connecting wire that makes them at worst unusable for hearing students and at best very annoying to suffer through.
The right wire and the right terminations can fix this -- but it's not inexpensive. I've owned and used wired Etymotic products for decades. Their electronic stuff is quite good, but forward progress there fell off following the Lucid acquisition.
 
The right wire and the right terminations can fix this -- but it's not inexpensive. I've owned and used wired Etymotic products for decades. Their electronic stuff is quite good, but forward progress there fell off following the Lucid acquisition.
Couldn’t agree more. Used their in ear monitors in a previous life.

They make the somewhat decent Ottos I use now.

-J
 
Back
Top