Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Those are a little more expensive than Temu Crocs.I wanted a camp shoe that was secure enough to be able to ford streams with and Crocs didn’t check that box. Went with Arcteryx Novans- I think they were 12oz for the pair.
Think extreme light trail runners.
I use something very similar to this at work, not sure why it never crossed my mind to use them for hunting. I have crocs that I clip to my pack and don’t like them all that well, but they are cheap and light weight. The only issue I could see with these types of slip on’s is they take awhile to dry and they are not comfortable to walk over rocks with. I walk into the water with mine with minimal gear/weight on and the walk sucks until I am in water deep enough to take the weight/pressure off my feet. Its not unbearable by any means, but I also don’t have a pack on. Small rocks, gravel and sand is fine, its the larger round or sharper rocks that suck.
My woman calls my Hey Dudes "Hey Dads" lolWalmart has knock off Hey Dudes that are super light and cheap. My buddy calls em Hi Guys.
He has every hole filled with the little charm Giblets....How the heck big are your feet that crocs are 20 ounces?
I have a hard time not going with "Bistro Clog" crocs. I like the ability to use them for water crossings and that most of the lightweight slipper type shoe options have holes in them and the Bistro clogs are closed toe and keep your socks free of plant debris and sand.
Additionally, the closed toe ones are MUCH warmer.
If I know the area and it’s just for camp use, then crocs or any lightweight version are great.
I know this is off topic but a long time ago I switched to light weight running shoes like Merrel and more recently “On” runners for this. They don’t dry as fast so not perfect for camp shoes, but Slip on style shoes like Crocs are terrible for tricky water crossings where you’re struggling in fast flowing water with river rocks rolling under your feet, or crossing silty, muddy stretches that’ll suck slip-ons off your feet constantly.
Lose your footing once and your crocs are probably gone.
So it’s been lightweight shoes for me that I can tie nice and tight on my feet and can also hike with them on trail if needed.
I’ve sheep hunted a lot in areas where there were multiple creek crossings in a row while hiking up valleys, and a good pair of lightweight shoes can be just left on and just keep moving in between crossings. Very hard to do with any kind of slip-on.
Yeah, I need to earn my caribou charm.He has every hole filled with the little charm Giblets....![]()
I'm not looking for camp shoes but my consumer small voice wants to say if these are more expensive than my ofos they must be better...Kanes are far more secure than crocs, similar material but closed heel, wear wading and walking daily. Weigh 11.7-18 oz depending on size. Can sipe to increase traction on wet surfaces. Also available in closed model with neoprene collar
I think its going to be slippery if the rocks are slick at all.Maybe not what you're looking for, but this year i think I'm going to try a thin insole stuffed into a wool sock for a water crossing type 'shoe' instead of the crocs. A pair of costco Merino blend socks, and the stock insoles out of a pair of size 13 Aku boots weighs 4.4oz.
I haven't tried it outside the house yet, but I'm thinking it'll provide enough protection from the rocks for river crossings, and would make a decent stalking sock if needed. Probably not ideal for spending hours in camp, especially if it's wet or snowy, though I'll usually just put my boots on if I've got a lot of walking to do.
Not a shoe but xero has a minimalist sandal.
My standard daily footwear for the last 20 yrs- quality running shoes from Asics,more recently OC have been completely replaced by these shoes. While I no longer run, these are worn for everything else to my spouses dismay at times. My primary running shoes were replaced at 400 mile intervals and cycled into casual wear until the next pair were rotated, I find these shoes being replaced after about 6 months of continuous daily wear as the air chambers molded into the forefoot sole become exposed reducing the cushioning on hard surfaces. The older shoes are resiped and wear as water shoes, the material does not absorb water and dry immediately when water is wiped off the surface. Wore teva flipflops while offshore fishing for years, have been replaced by these shoes,provide far better foot protection. Have not tried to run distances. Have never worn ofos so can offer no opinion. Tried to buy a pr of the closed, gaitered shoe to wear in the snow but out of stock. Suspect the eva material will provide good insulation.I'm not looking for camp shoes but my consumer small voice wants to say if these are more expensive than my ofos they must be better...
So are they?