Triple 6 Update/Delay

[Unknown Suppressors]

I want to give everyone an update on the Triple 6. We have been "done" with the design for a couple weeks now, however, as we are working through the final testing we come to the conclusion that it really doesn't do anything that the OG65 doesn't already do. We don't want to launch this can as "good enough" when we know that we can make it better. A 6mm can is very near and dear to US and we want to knock it out of the park with the design, not look back 6 months from now and wish we had done better or wish we had applied the knowledge gained in that ammount of time. We want to take more time to continue development, testing and improvement. As of right now we are likely delaying launch until March ish, Today looking at the production schedule and windows for printing prototypes, we think this gives us plenty of time to develop something that is measurably better.

I will provide development updates in this thread as they emerge. I am sorry to anyone that we promised would be able to have this suppressor on a much shorter timeline. Feedback and thoughts from everyone will be greatly appreciated, this decision is largely based on the feedback we have gotten from our other suppressor launches.

 

[benconfused]

I want to give everyone an update on the Triple 6. We have been "done" with the design for a couple weeks now, however, as we are working through the final testing we come to the conclusion that it really doesn't do anything that the OG65 doesn't already do. We don't want to launch this can as "good enough" when we know that we can make it better. A 6mm can is very near and dear to US and we want to knock it out of the park with the design, not look back 6 months from now and wish we had done better or wish we had applied the knowledge gained in that ammount of time. We want to take more time to continue development, testing and improvement. As of right now we are likely delaying launch until March ish, Today looking at the production schedule and windows for printing prototypes, we think this gives us plenty of time to develop something that is measurably better.

I will provide development updates in this thread as they emerge. I am sorry to anyone that we promised would be able to have this suppressor on a much shorter timeline. Feedback and thoughts from everyone will be greatly appreciated, this decision is largely based on the feedback we have gotten from our other suppressor launches.

Happy and sad to hear this at the same time. Keep developing and make it amazing....and maybe even less than 6 inches

 

[Thejet]

I want to give everyone an update on the Triple 6. We have been "done" with the design for a couple weeks now, however, as we are working through the final testing we come to the conclusion that it really doesn't do anything that the OG65 doesn't already do. We don't want to launch this can as "good enough" when we know that we can make it better. A 6mm can is very near and dear to US and we want to knock it out of the park with the design, not look back 6 months from now and wish we had done better or wish we had applied the knowledge gained in that ammount of time. We want to take more time to continue development, testing and improvement. As of right now we are likely delaying launch until March ish, Today looking at the production schedule and windows for printing prototypes, we think this gives us plenty of time to develop something that is measurably better.

I will provide development updates in this thread as they emerge. I am sorry to anyone that we promised would be able to have this suppressor on a much shorter timeline. Feedback and thoughts from everyone will be greatly appreciated, this decision is largely based on the feedback we have gotten from our other suppressor launches.

We forgive you, best send me one of the protos for safe keeping in the mean time

 

[Unknown Suppressors]

We forgive you, best send me one of the protos for safe keeping in the mean time

I have a handful of prototypes right now, I expect by the time we are done there will be a pile of prototypes. They will all be posted for sale around launch time, if not before that!

 

[RWT]

I believe this to be a smart move. If it is to similar to the others in suppression then it’s worth the wait for a product that is a considerable improvement. Hoping for a OTB in the 124 db range. Still think someone should go all in on a 2” diameter can. Better yet make the external diameter cone shaped similar to a funnel. Huge rear piece that is OTB narrowing to a smaller blast chamber in front.

Curious is there a software that allows you to load the internal dimensions and then the subsequent pressure wave of the blast to determine ROM reduction in decibel levels?

Once you build something below 125 db and under 8 oz you will have my $.

 

[Formidilosus]

Once you build something below 125 db and under 8 oz you will have my $.

Well, you will keep your money for a long time. That is below the sonic crack of the bullet and is in the realm of 9-12” long 338 cans.

 

[RWT]

Well, you will keep your money for a long time. That is below the sonic crack of the bullet and is in the realm of 9-12” long 338 cans.

Curious do you think this is possible with a 9” with 5” forward and 4” OTB. Looking for one that is a considerable increase over the TBAC 7. The triple 6 was looking like it might get there due to the 2” OTB. I am fine with the U7 since I’ve cut most of barrels to 16”. I had plans for the T6 to go on my line 20” barrel if it hovered around 127db.

 

[Formidilosus]

Curious do you think this is possible with a 9” with 5” forward and 4” OTB.

For what cartridge and barrel length?