Trijicon AccuPoint vs Huron vs Credo 3-9's; how is the AccuPoint so light?

[KenLee]

The scope lords and lords of physics are scared of the 3-9x40 and 2.5-10x56 accupoints.

 

[Begle1]

The scope lords and lords of physics are scared of the 3-9x40 and 2.5-10x56 accupoints.

I have no idea what this means.

 

[KenLee]

I have no idea what this means.

They are better,lighter, and more reliable than what the #s say they should be

 

[dreamingWest]

I really want to try that accupoint with mil reticle but they used moa turrets? I realize this is not a dialing scope but that's irritating.

Ultimately I think I'll end up with a credo for only a few more oz and matching turrets, especially if actual weight is 16oz as previously reported.

I own 2.5-12.5x42 and 4-16x50 Accupoints that are Mil/Mil. Excellent hunting scopes! The 4-16 is capped windage and a elevation turrent, almost perfect.

It would be great if they updated the little 3-9x40.

If they made a 3-12x44 in the same manner as the 4-16x50 Mil/Mil, you couldn't make a better SFP hunting scope.

 

[thinhorn_AK]

I really want to try that accupoint with mil reticle but they used moa turrets? I realize this is not a dialing scope but that's irritating.

Ultimately I think I'll end up with a credo for only a few more oz and matching turrets, especially if actual weight is 16oz as previously reported.

One of my 3-9 accupoints is the mil dot reticle, I just use it for holding over, it works great. I don’t really shoot animals far enough away to bother with dialing 95% of the time.

 

[bigunit]

I didn't say free. I said FOR A FEE.

Ah my bad. Reading comprehension is not my thing apparently