The triangle is much more visible/illuminated than the small dots for the duplex/mildot. So in darker bush as we have here in NZ it's faster acquisition. Also for older eyes he says it's much easier to see vs. the smaller options. He has been the importer for over a decade so he has a lot of experience with these optics and has seen basically no warranty issues with them.
Since most hunting ranges here are 0-300m realistically you can just set a 200m zero and hit anything in front of you. If it's 300m or so then you hold high shoulder shot and drop it into the target easy. No dialing or elaborate holdovers needed. So the post is a good choice for visibility and simplicity. He feels the triangle post is more precise if you do want to dial, but I'm not sure about that as the post could obscure bullet splash on low hits. Anyway, for the ranges I expect to shoot I think it's fine.
I run a Blaser R8 and am thinking of using my Nightforce SHV for dialing hunting situations where I want something heavier. Then swap the Trijicon where I am not interested in dialing and just want something lightweight and simple. NZ hunting conditions can be very hard on equipment. Often rifle being carried for many kms, wet weather, alpine conditions, etc. The scope must be able to take abuse.
That makes sense. I’m in Aus and have hunted NZ a couple of times so know what you’re referring to condition wise.
I actually have my Trijicon on my R8 30-06 and a SHV 3-10 for that barrel also. My logic is the same as yours and think it works well for me.