Tikka 6.5 PRC & bullet selection

MCF

FNG
Joined
Jan 28, 2025
Messages
4
Location
South Alabama
Tikka rifle coming tomorrow in 6.5 PRC. I have shunned the CM in the past, but the PRC has me intrigued. I reload for several calibers, and already have what I need for this project, except for powder and bullets. I have heard that the 6.5 cm sometimes passes through without enough tissue damage and exit hole to leave a good blood trail, and definitely want to avoid that scenario. I am looking at the Berger EOL 156 for an all purpose, and the 130 Accubond for hunting, probably with some H-1000. My favorite deer load is a 7-08 loaded with 139 SST’s. I seldom get an exit wound, but I never have to track a deer. I usually sacrifice a shoulder, which I can live with. It has worked for me for 20 plus years. I have ZERO experience with the 6.5 caliber, and would like to start off right.
I am open to your suggestions. I am listening.
 

sniper20

FNG
Joined
Aug 8, 2024
Messages
41
Location
South Dakota
I shot a doe with 153.5 Bergers with my 6.5 PRC, blew a hole about the size of a baseball out the backside... No need to track when they drop right there...
 
  • Like
Reactions: MCF

Laramie

WKR
Joined
Apr 17, 2020
Messages
2,660
We have tested several different bullets. All killed very well from antelope to elk. 142 accubond lr worked well on my son's bull. 143 and 147 Hornady both kill well worth great expansion and damage. Will be shootting the 156 next just for fun. You will love the caliber. Low recoil, very accurate, great terminal performance... not much to dislike imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MCF
OP
MCF

MCF

FNG
Joined
Jan 28, 2025
Messages
4
Location
South Alabama
140 grain Accubonds or 142 grain ABLR

I never had any issues with exits or blood trails with my 6.5 Creedmoor. Don’t know where you got that from. 🤷🏼‍♂️
It is usually the 143 Eldx that I hear about the issue. Could just be a bunch of new shooters with the new round that take poor shots. But I hear about them running hundreds of yards after a “good shot”.
 

Macintosh

WKR
Joined
Feb 17, 2018
Messages
3,030
Well, I shot a deer at 40 yards this fall with a 30-06 right on the point of the shoulder, took out both lungs on the way thru…My deer still ran 50ish yards. that doesnt mean much, just like lots of the cartridge characterizations dont mean much without more info. Frankly anyone that says a 6.5mm bottle necked centerfire cartridge at typical whitetailed deer range is going to frequently pass thru without enough tissue damage is simply ignorant of what different bullets do. Pick a mono or a hard bonded bullet and that’ll be just as true of your prc as it is of a creedmore or of your 7-08. If thats not what you want, put an sst or any other similar bullet (ballistic tip, eldm, eldx, etc) in any of these guns into a deer and its going to make a big hole and kill quickly, and maybe waste some meat. If you like your 7-08, a creedmore is indistinguishable from it assuming the same bullet type and similar bullet weight. Your prc is just the same thing, only a little faster. 140-class 6.5mm bullet at 2900-ish mv is going to be +\- indistinguishable from a 140-class of the same bullet type fired from a 7mm at 2800-ish—the difference will just be what 100-ish (or whatever) fps does. Dont expect it to make a big (or even noticeable) difference at whitetail ranges, assuming similar bullets.
 
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
709
Have been shooting 6.5 prc for a few years, and have used both the 156 eol and the 147 eldm on whitetail. Both performed well, the furthest distance a deer traveled was less than 40 yards after being shot. Would shoot either, but I prefer the wound channels of the eldm over the 156 eol.

my 6.5 prc barrel was essentially shot out this season, and velocities out of the muzzle had slowed to the same velocities of the 6.5 cm. I could not tell the difference in wound cavities and my next barrel will be a 6.5 CM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MCF
Joined
Sep 16, 2021
Messages
320
I built a 6.5 prc for hunting whitetails in MS. I have shot 8 (1 buck 7 does...we shoot a lot of does) this year from 100-458 yards. None of them went more than 30 yards, & several bang flops. I am shooting the 140 Berger Elites. I could not get the 156 EOL's to group but I am also shooting a 20" barrel. The only thing you will gain from a PRC over a regular CM is about 200 FPS. That doesn't matter inside of regular hunting distances. I am going to build a regular CM this summer to see how I like it as well.
 
Joined
Jul 23, 2024
Messages
10
I know it isn't the PRC, but I have shot 2 large does with the 6.5CM. One at ~150yds with the 143 ELD-X and one at ~200yds with the 129 interlock, both in the factory Hornady loadings. Both pass throughs, both 1 shot DRT. The ELD-X hit the heart on the way through and the interlock was a double lung.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MCF

huntsd

WKR
Joined
Jun 20, 2020
Messages
638
Tikka rifle coming tomorrow in 6.5 PRC. I have shunned the CM in the past, but the PRC has me intrigued. I reload for several calibers, and already have what I need for this project, except for powder and bullets. I have heard that the 6.5 cm sometimes passes through without enough tissue damage and exit hole to leave a good blood trail, and definitely want to avoid that scenario. I am looking at the Berger EOL 156 for an all purpose, and the 130 Accubond for hunting, probably with some H-1000. My favorite deer load is a 7-08 loaded with 139 SST’s. I seldom get an exit wound, but I never have to track a deer. I usually sacrifice a shoulder, which I can live with. It has worked for me for 20 plus years. I have ZERO experience with the 6.5 caliber, and would like to start off right.
I am open to your suggestions. I am listening.
correct me if I am wrong but doesnt a 6.5 CM shoot about 100fps less?
 

Laramie

WKR
Joined
Apr 17, 2020
Messages
2,660
correct me if I am wrong but doesnt a 6.5 CM shoot about 100fps less?
My PRC is 225 FPS faster with factory loads than my buddies CM. Factory data typically shows 200fps+ faster. Not a big deal inside of standard hunting ranges but it's a big deal at long range imo.
 
Top