If I'm being honest I'm not entirely sure what you were responding to, I just took your comments at face value. If I misread your argument I apologize.I thought I was responding to the notion that Bitcoin will be adopted as some kind of currency or monetary standard, but looks like I might've misread it. If the notion is that it's just a deflationary store of value, OK. That's kind of by definition what it is so no argument there.
If the argument was that it should be currency as we understand it, then that did deserve to be criticized. Transactions are to slow and resource intensive.
Now as a monetary standard or a backer of currency that's a different story. I would be concerned with holding any currency solely backed by Bitcoin, at least until we see how quantum computing changes things.. Now a portfolio of Bitcoin and non digital assets such as gold, silver, etc that's an entirely different story.
In a future where the $ has collapsed I could see a monetary system with a suite of tools that revolve around bitcoin. If for no other reason than this one simple question, if the $ collapses tomorrow what currently existing option would be better than Bitcoin? Every country will try to push their currency with their own unique digital currency. Are you going to trust any of them? Are they going to trust one another's currency in trade? All on the heals of the chaos that will be caused by a collapsed $.

