Thanks for your feedback. Which suppressor(s) and which suppressor brake(s) have you experienced this with? I
think I want one for my NRL Hunter rifle, but I'm in full sponge mode trying to learn everything I can about this subject.
I'm hardly an expert on sound, and I don't have experience yet with suppressor brakes. Indeed, my suppressor experience is relatively limited (3 centerfire rifle cans over about 8 years, but 2 of those cans came in the last 2 years.) But I'm curious about your subjective claim that with a 6 dB one "might as well keep the barrel long ad shoot a good brake." Why?
Here's the background for my skepticism. Using the recent Outdoor Life data for convenient reference (and understanding it's not really scientific or perfect):
- Bare muzzle was 165 dBA
- Adding a Dead Air Nomad XC Ti (just for reference) reduced their measured dBA to 139.5 dBA
- Adding the Recoil X Gen 2 (again, just picked for reference) to that can increased it back up to 145.1 dBA
- By way of reference, a Banish Backcountry metered 142.2 and Gunwerks 6IX metered 144.2
- But a CHAD or Hellfire brake increases dBA to 167-168.9 dBA
So I understand a 3 dBA increase is perceptively louder and double the sound energy. A 10 dBA increase is generally said to be perceived as twice as loud by the human brain. But if putting a well-designed suppressor brake on good, full size suppressor gets me sound reduction on-par with most of the lightweight "hunting" cans plus gives me muzzle rise control, why would I want to use a regular "good brake" that's going to be exponentially louder? What am I missing?