Wow, and yes, thanks for reviving this story! I can't believe this was written over a year ago and I'm just now seeing/reading it. Man, that is a tough pill to swallow for sure. You had one goat tag, killed one goat, but because your son was the one that pulled the trigger and not you, the goat was confiscated? Man, that doesn't seem right. Why would it matter if the minor, who could legally harvest a goat, was hunting with you and harvested your goat? IMO that is one F'd up law.
Under the Alaska laws, a resident hunter age 10-17 who have their Basic Hunter Education competed are allowed to hunt on behalf of an adult permit holder, under the direct, immediate supervision of that adult. Unfortunately we also have a lot of screwed up laws, but that one in particular is one they got right.
Man, I am truly sorry for your loss, but good on you for setting the right example. I hope that at the very least you got to enjoy a nice goat back strap dinner, prior to it being confiscated.
How can you even be considered a human if you confiscate a goat from a 10 year old kid?
Its quit simple they had no tag, its not the COs fault, they could have possible been charged a lot more.How can you even be considered a human if you confiscate a goat from a 10 year old kid?
Its quit simple they had no tag, its not the COs fault, they could have possible been charged a lot more.
Curious if you feel someone could tag along on your sheep hunt, shoot a ram and use your tag and be good. One tag one sheep?OK, I’m gonna play devils advocate here and argue, they did have a tag. Dad notched his tag for the goat that his son killed but that didn’t suffice.As far as I’m concerned, he did the absolute right thing given the small mistake that was made, and the fact that their goat was confiscated anyway is complete BS. You could never get me to agree that, that law is appropriate. They had one goat tag, they killed one legal goat, yet because that tag was in dad’s name and his son was the one that pulled the trigger, they were penalized. Complete BS in my opinion.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Curious if you feel someone could tag along on your sheep hunt, shoot a ram and use your tag and be good. One tag one sheep?
Sent from my moto z3 using Tapatalk
Again its quit simple as all ready stated if his boy had a youth license it would have been all legal as to the way you say. He has taken his hunter training course and has his own hunter number and license so needs his own tags, period.OK, I’m gonna play devils advocate here and argue, they did have a tag. Dad notched his tag for the goat that his son killed but that didn’t suffice.As far as I’m concerned, he did the absolute right thing given the small mistake that was made, and the fact that their goat was confiscated anyway is complete BS. You could never get me to agree that, that law is appropriate. They had one goat tag, they killed one legal goat, yet because that tag was in dad’s name and his son was the one that pulled the trigger, they were penalized. Complete BS in my opinion.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I get it. They made a mistake but man taking a kids goat just seems harsh especially when they didn’t try to hide it and admitted their mistake. Is there no grace at all for a kid who isn’t even at fault?Its quit simple they had no tag, its not the COs fault, they could have possible been charged a lot more.