Quandary
FNG
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2023
- Messages
- 48
Will the Whidden 6UM die set be available in both the 30* and 40* shoulders?
Yes, but with less recoil and getting those speeds with a shorter barrel is a win-win for hunting. I wouldn’t want to use it for high round use target practice… I’m assuming the barrel life would be pretty short.There are already people getting 3,500fps MV with 115’s and the UM.
Yes, but with less recoil and getting those speeds with a shorter barrel is a win-win for hunting. I wouldn’t want to use it for high round use target practice… I’m assuming the barrel life would be pretty short.
Isn't the whole premise of the steel cases, to use less powder to achieve higher pressure and velocity? Less grains of powder will produce less recoil or am I totally misunderstanding the new cartridge from federal?How would a steel alloy 6UM case decrease recoil?
Isn't the whole premise of the steel cases, to use less powder to achieve higher pressure and velocity? Less grains of powder will produce less recoil or am I totally misunderstanding the new cartridge from federal?
Makes sense, same case, but different metals would not change much except the ability to increase pressure. It would have to be a redesigned case to try and achieve similar ballistics with less recoil. Thus new case using less powder to get similar velocities.That wasn’t what @Kronos asked. He asked when there would be steel alloy 6UM cases to allow 3,500fp mv with 115gr bullets. I pointed out that there are already 6UM’s doing 3,500fps MV with 115’s. To which he replied “but with less recoil”. That’s makes no sense.
A steel alloy case allows you to load to higher pressure, and therefore achieve higher MV in the same cartridge- it’s isn’t going to reduce recoil in the same cartridge, but increase it.
Case measurements
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
No, I am slow and stated it wrong. I also got more first-hand data on the 6-6.5 PRC with 115 Dtacs and 108 last week and will put up numbers and fix that part of the podcast. I have to stop drinking and podcasting.@Ryan Avery listening to the shoot to hunt podcast today about the 6um and I believe you stated that the 6um30 and the 6-6.5 prc had the same case capacity and one could expect 3150 fps out of a 20” barrel. Is that accurate and these numbers written on the page are wrong or am I just slow per usual and misunderstanding?
listening to the shoot to hunt podcast today about the 6um and I believe you stated that the 6um30 and the 6-6.5 prc had the same case capacity and one could expect 3150 fps out of a 20” barrel. Is that accurate and these numbers written on the page are wrong or am I just slow per usual and misunderstanding?
The primer is going to be the limiting factor hereA steel alloy case allows you to load to higher pressure, and therefore achieve higher MV in the same cartridge
The primer is going to be the limiting factor here
To improve much is going to take a different priming system, probably along the lines of the failed Remington electrically fired concept
Didn't the etronics or whatever rifles just use a different priming/ignition system? I feel like you could still use the same brass....so it would still have the same capacity to handle pressure I would think.The primer is going to be the limiting factor here
To improve much is going to take a different priming system, probably along the lines of the failed Remington electrically fired concept
Steel and composite cases will take much higher pressures.
To achieve higher velocities a new way to ignite the powder has to be developed because the primer cup is the weakest link
Thats where im at with it tooI believe the amount of propellant is one of those technically yes as the recoil has to account for moving the mass of the propellant out of the barrel.
But o don’t know how that compares with a pressure increase.
My brain is saying if 2 scenarios both involve a 150gr bullet at 3000fps (theoretical) in the same length barrel the one using 10 grains more powder simple has to recoil more. Not much, but technically more