stephen b
WKR
One thing that stood out to me when I looked through the Cabelas Euro spotter that I bought recently- was that it had a quite pronounced warmer almost yellow bias to it. It really stood out in side by side testing compared to the Swarovski STM, and the Nikon Fieldscope. The Swarovski and the Nikon have much more of a neutral color; with the Nikon being ever so slightly warmer than the Swarovski.
The Cabelas/ Meopta had a markedly warmer almost yellow quality to the color. I had checked one of these Meopta spotters before and do not recall that being as much the case. But when looking across the valley at the grass on the hillside and looking at vegetation, it was quite apparent.
This was even more noticeable on cloudy days. This may be a design element to help with some resolution and contrast; but I did not find that it really helped with perceived sharpness in this situations. The Swarovski and the Nikon that I tested were both sharper than Meopta in picking out details. Also the warmer tone of the Meopta made spotter almost made things (details) look more muted than the other 2. Myself, and couple of friends and my wife all easily noticed this characteristic.
I no longer have the Swarovski STM, but I still have the Nikon and the Cabelas/ Meopta spotter. I took pics this AM to try and give an idea of the color through the (2) of them. The pics with my hand held iPhone do not quite pic up the difference as well as the scopes themselves. Hopefully the pics come through.
Here is the pic through the Nikon Fieldscope ( at 25x) :

And here is Pic through the Cabelas Euro- also at 25x:

The Cabelas/ Meopta had a markedly warmer almost yellow quality to the color. I had checked one of these Meopta spotters before and do not recall that being as much the case. But when looking across the valley at the grass on the hillside and looking at vegetation, it was quite apparent.
This was even more noticeable on cloudy days. This may be a design element to help with some resolution and contrast; but I did not find that it really helped with perceived sharpness in this situations. The Swarovski and the Nikon that I tested were both sharper than Meopta in picking out details. Also the warmer tone of the Meopta made spotter almost made things (details) look more muted than the other 2. Myself, and couple of friends and my wife all easily noticed this characteristic.
I no longer have the Swarovski STM, but I still have the Nikon and the Cabelas/ Meopta spotter. I took pics this AM to try and give an idea of the color through the (2) of them. The pics with my hand held iPhone do not quite pic up the difference as well as the scopes themselves. Hopefully the pics come through.
Here is the pic through the Nikon Fieldscope ( at 25x) :

And here is Pic through the Cabelas Euro- also at 25x:
