Wondering if I should have gone with the 12's ... ended up going with the 10's
Ha! I ordered 12x NLs wondering if I should have got 10x NLs.... we'll see!
Wondering if I should have gone with the 12's ... ended up going with the 10's
First, lets see what the birding community has to say about the NL's as they have the best knowledge and experience of comparing real world differences with alpha glass.
One issue I see with the NL is the lack of support at the end of the barrels.
Are you gonna give us some insight on the performance? Some of us are still waiting for then to shipI used to buy into this stereotype. Lately though, I think it is the opposite. Serious hunters put their glass to hard use in the most demanding of conditions. That goes for conditions that demand top optical performance and durability. There are plenty of hunters that have an eye for optical evaluation and the income necessary to shop the top shelf, too. In fact I would estimate the hunting optics market has definitely shifted to higher priced products over the last ten years. Look at the hunter interest in the NLs.
Is this a speculative concern? Hunting for the past 3 days with the NLs, I have no concerns about the single bridge design (although it seems more like a double bridge with the focus wheel in the middle). These are a very sturdy feeling binocular in the hand.
Maybe, the NLs are that good! Once you look thru them, you are SPEECHLESS!
I read on some bird forum, where they mentioned the construction of the Swarovski NL is more vulnerable to breakage and misalignment? Something about the barrel configuration? Do they test these binoculars for a stress test? Like they do with optical scopes (Nightforce, Leupold, etc......). I’d hate to be in the back country and have something go wrong. I’m not bashing them. Was just curious on what part of the construction makes them more prone to be knocked off?
Except Swarovski isn't discounting the 12x50... only the 10 and 8x.On the bright side, look at the opportunity now to get into the now " inferior" el and slc lines at a reduced price. This is a win win for hunters who now can get into the swarovski line who might not have been able to afford it before.
I agree but the used market is definitely a buyers market at this time. Some screaming good deals recently on here in the classified.Except Swarovski isn't discounting the 12x50... only the 10 and 8x.
I read on some bird forum, where they mentioned the construction of the Swarovski NL is more vulnerable to breakage and misalignment? Something about the barrel configuration? Do they test these binoculars for a stress test? Like they do with optical scopes (Nightforce, Leupold, etc......). I’d hate to be in the back country and have something go wrong. I’m not bashing them. Was just curious on what part of the construction makes them more prone to be knocked off?
Is this a speculative concern? Hunting for the past 3 days with the NLs, I have no concerns about the single bridge design (although it seems more like a double bridge with the focus wheel in the middle). These are a very sturdy feeling binocular in the hand.
I used to buy into this stereotype. Lately though, I think it is the opposite. Serious hunters put their glass to hard use in the most demanding of conditions. That goes for conditions that demand top optical performance and durability. There are plenty of hunters that have an eye for optical evaluation and the income necessary to shop the top shelf, too. In fact I would estimate the hunting optics market has definitely shifted to higher priced products over the last ten years. Look at the hunter interest in the NLs.
Is this a speculative concern? Hunting for the past 3 days with the NLs, I have no concerns about the single bridge design (although it seems more like a double bridge with the focus wheel in the middle). These are a very sturdy feeling binocular in the hand.
Im waiting on the 18x-20x NL Pures, lol@Matt Cashell will be doing a review comparing these two binoculars.
***Update 11/15/20*** Matt's review is available here.
Matt will be way more technical than I am but I have been using the 12 ELs for the last five years and had the 12 NLs on a recent mule deer hunt. Here are a few things I notice. The NLs FOV is WIDE and usable to the very edge, it's almost too much. You will instantly fall in love with the ergonomics and size of these binoculars, they just fit, making it much easier to handhold over the 12 ELs. The 12 NLs do seem to be a little more eye box critical than the 12 ELs. I also think the 12 ELs might give you a little more low light performance. That would be expecting with a 50mm objective. But not enough to matter in hunting scenarios. I didn't have the forehead rest. I will try to get that for Matt's review.
I believe the bigger the usable FOV the more animals you spot. The 12 NLs give you 39' more at 1000 yards or the 12 ELs.
10x42 ELs vs 12x42 NLs
The outdoorsman’s stud screws in.
It helps you find good bucks.