Stock vs Chassis for Field Shooting

D R T

FNG
Joined
Nov 9, 2023
Messages
29
Location
Texas
Great thread with super info. Found this looking around, but I’m sure you’ve all seen it. I’m relatively new here and still stumbling through A LOT of information.

https://mdttac.com/mdt-field-stock-chassis-system/

“Comfortable to carry long distances in the woods with a traditional stock design. The lightweight polymer is warm to the touch on cold days.” Their words, not mine.

Negative comb. I like the rounded edges and corners. Nice looking grip. Little heavy but not unpackable. Tikka ready!
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
2,617
Location
hawai'i
Great thread with super info. Found this looking around, but I’m sure you’ve all seen it. I’m relatively new here and still stumbling through A LOT of information.

https://mdttac.com/mdt-field-stock-chassis-system/

“Comfortable to carry long distances in the woods with a traditional stock design. The lightweight polymer is warm to the touch on cold days.” Their words, not mine.

Negative comb. I like the rounded edges and corners. Nice looking grip. Little heavy but not unpackable. Tikka ready!
Reports are the forends are flimsy. They don't aluminum backing them for rigidity like the krg bravo does
 

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
9,484
Great thread with super info. Found this looking around, but I’m sure you’ve all seen it. I’m relatively new here and still stumbling through A LOT of information.

https://mdttac.com/mdt-field-stock-chassis-system/

“Comfortable to carry long distances in the woods with a traditional stock design. The lightweight polymer is warm to the touch on cold days.” Their words, not mine.

Negative comb. I like the rounded edges and corners. Nice looking grip. Little heavy but not unpackable. Tikka ready!

They are a poor stock. Forend is a noodle, grip is contoured poorly, comb is thin and sharp, toe is thin and hard to hold onto- overall probably the poorest shooting “modern stock” on the market.
 

Article 4

WKR
Joined
Mar 4, 2019
Messages
520
Location
The Great Northwest
We just spent a week with 10x Roksliders shooting in the mountains, despite what was initially though and brought, I do not believe any of them want metal chassis, 5lb shooting tripods, rails all over the forend, etc. after doing it for a week.

This is field shooting that I am speaking about and are all shots we’ve had to take in the last couple years of hunting-

View attachment 577438

View attachment 577439

View attachment 577440

View attachment 577441

View attachment 577448


And using it on animals.

Just killed an elk, no time to use a tripod-
View attachment 577442


Just killed an elk. No time for a tripod, and snow is too deep for a bipod unless you had a triple pull-
View attachment 577445


Just killed a bear, standing off the top of a hiking stick, couldn’t go lower than standing, and no time for a tripod-
View attachment 577446


Just killed an elk, bipod sucked on this frozen ground- didn’t want to load due to slipping-
View attachment 577447




I am aware that some people purposely set up where their only shot will be prone off a bipod, or sitting off a tripod, etc., and they set up their rifles/equipment specifically for that. Thats fine. However that is hardly normal for most hunters, nor is it the most effective way to setup rifles for killing animals at will under any condition. Just as with PRS setups it is contrived, not born out of necessity due to field conditions.
To me, aligned with much of this, I think both platforms have their place. I currently use a few rifles with chassis and a few with high quality carbon stocks. My preference and opinion:

Chassis belongs in comps
Carbon stocks are made to hunt - the two hybrid features that I like from the chassis world are an adjustable cheek piece and a mini chassis in a carbon based stock.

Something to consider. Every metal based chassis is going to get really cold in November and December hunting. Not that is always a bad thing but damn, grabbing a rifle that is sitting in 0 degree temps for any length of time sucks. Much less putting my cheek on it.
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2019
Messages
1,537
I think my updated plan for when I rebuild a hunting rifle again will be a Manners LRH stock and a full length R-Lock rail on it from Sawtooth. I love that Foundation and Manners use KMW Loggerhead hardware for their cheekpieces.
 
Joined
Dec 7, 2014
Messages
721
I've been going back and forth between soley using a rokstock or adding a rifle in an XLR I haven't built out yet (may sell it), bumping this again for some more opinions.
 
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
655
I read through this very informative good thread and felt i had to chime in my experience with the XLR chassis.

I dont hunt or shoot near as much as @Formidilosus , but i get a few days in the field and pop a few primers getting ready.

The metal chassis in the cold has not been as big of an issue as i thought it would be. The coldest hunt I have taken it on reached a low of -5 at night, with temps in the low 20's. Gloves kept the chill off when handling the rifle. That said, the rifle spends most its life strapped to the side of the pack. I also don't hunt much in truly cold weather. I don't make a habit carrying a rifle in my hands and i don't take off hand shots. I do practice engaging the rifle from the pack.

One selling point for a metal chassis is how stiff the system is. I was dissapointed in the forend flex i found in other conventional stocks, even high quality stocks like mcmillan.

Compared to the conventional stocks I have used, the XLR chassis has much better ergonomics than anything I have used prior.

A folding stock is a huge luxury. Highly reccomend.

The rifle system has not lost zero and has passed every drop test I have performed. Very confidence inspiring to see the first bullet pass through the bullseye after traveling halfway around the world.

As others have said, no stock or chassis is perfect. This works for me and i dont see me changing anytime soon. I have killed game with much worse.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 7, 2014
Messages
721
I read through this very informative good thread and felt i had to chime in my experience with the XLR chassis.

I dont hunt or shoot near as much as @Formidilosus , but i get a few days in the field and pop a few primers getting ready.

The metal chassis in the cold has not been as big of an issue as i thought it would be. The coldest hunt I have taken it on reached a low of -5 at night, with temps in the low 20's. Gloves kept the chill off when handling the rifle. That said, the rifle spends most its life strapped to the side of the pack. I also don't hunt much in truly cold weather. I don't make a habit carrying a rifle in my hands and i don't take off hand shots. I do practice engaging the rifle from the pack.

One selling point for a metal chassis is how stiff the system is. I was dissapointed in the forend flex i found in other conventional stocks, even high quality stocks like mcmillan.

Compared to the conventional stocks I have used, the XLR chassis has much better ergonomics than anything I have used prior.

A folding stock is a huge luxury. Highly reccomend.

The rifle system has not lost zero and has passed every drop test I have performed. Very confidence inspiring to see the first bullet pass through the bullseye after traveling halfway around the world.

As others have said, no stock or chassis is perfect. This works for me and i dont see me changing anytime soon. I have killed game with much worse.
are you using a 700 style action or something else? My XLR is for a SA 700 but i've been considering going tikka instead- but the tikka seems much less seamless (heavier, magazine compatibility)
 
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
655
are you using a 700 style action or something else? My XLR is for a SA 700 but i've been considering going tikka instead- but the tikka seems much less seamless (heavier, magazine compatibility)
Im using a tikka. I ordered the LA version and have no complaints so far.

MDT 3.56" magazine works great.
 
Last edited:
Top