@Formidilosus
which would be better terminally... a 107/116tmk at 1800fps impact velocity compared to a 108/109eldm at a higher 2000fps impact velocity? Assuming same shot placement (elk, mule deer, moose, bears, etc).
"better" could be...
which one incapacitates quicker
which one gets offside exits more often
which one has a bigger wound channel
which one causes more or less meat loss
which one penetrates more tissue depth
which one has the animal running less
My 18" 6CM currently shoots the 108 and 109eldm well. 2910fps MV with the 109eldm. (.75moa with 8 shots) The kids and I have taken a number of deer, elk, and bears with both bullets. Lowest impact velocity with the 109eldm was about 2390fps (over 400 yards). Lowest impact velocity with the 108eldm was around 2150fps.
Just wondering what gains I might see switching to the 107/116 TMK.
Also, what have you settled on for the best adjusted BC for the 116tmk? If I read correctly, you found a .590 to be accurate early on, but later mentioned .600g1. Does the average BC change or drop for truing beyond a certain yardage? (Ie, is the posted/advertised BC of .609g1 for the 116tmk more likely to be accurate under 700 yards and a .590g1 more accurate over 1000 yards as the bullet drops in velocity?)
How accurate is the advertised .580BC for the 107TMK in any of your recent testing?
Thanks for all your work and insights here!