Sierra Heavy TMK 6MM Testing

Just pointing out that it’s just temp, pressure, and humidity needed, assuming you use absolute pressure.

I was referring to absolute pressure using shooter. It’s just temp and DA

IMG_9809.jpeg

I know AB has temp, pressure, and humidity then just converts it for you to show the DA at the bottom.
 
Siding for pressure input? I’m not sure what you’re asking.

Generally solvers are set up to run DA and temp or Elevation, pressure(HG), humidity, and temp.

Sorry I meant what are you guys inputting for pressure into JBM bullet stability. It only asks for pressure and temp as environmental inputs


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
So help me understand thinking here (or at least where my mind has gone)…IF these bullets perform on game as is hoped, does this make this the bullet of choice for the 6UM for ALL big game? I’ve seen comments related to the DTAC on deer sized game not performing exactly as desired, but being darn near perfect for elk. Does the 115-117 create a one and done bullet for both the deer and elk? Or is it too early to tell?
 
Are these bullets wanting to be 060-.080 off the lands like the DTAC?

In regards to COAL will the current freebore dimensions be optimal for these TMK’s ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don’t measure how far my bullets are off the lands as it doesn’t matter. Make sure it isn’t touching rifling and that it has some room.

 
Are these bullets wanting to be 060-.080 off the lands like the DTAC?

In regards to COAL will the current freebore dimensions be optimal for these TMK’s ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

While they weren't picky, they averaged shooting tighter groups jumping .070"-.080" vs .030"-.040"

The nose is long vs the common 108-109 options, jumping ~.030" put me essentially at mag length in all three rifles I tried. That hasn't been the case with say 109 ELD's or 109 Hybrids. Since they seemed to shoot better jumping farther, it seems like it's no factor.
 
I'm pretty sure this 115-117gr bullet will be the choice for anything 6mm 50gr capacity or above. The 107tmk will give another 100fps ceiling possibly. I imagine the 107 from an Arc at say 2600-2700 would be bad medicine out to 700y maybe 800y, and still achieve reliable bullet upset. This is all theoretical, but if these all perform similar to 95/77tmk, life will be good!
 
While they weren't picky, they averaged shooting tighter groups jumping .070"-.080" vs .030"-.040"

The nose is long vs the common 108-109 options, jumping ~.030" put me essentially at mag length in all three rifles I tried. That hasn't been the case with say 109 ELD's or 109 Hybrids. Since they seemed to shoot better jumping farther, it seems like it's no factor.
This is in your Seekins 6 CM correct? If so, SAAMI freebore of .183.

Seated at .080 off, where does this put the boat tail to shoulder junction in the case?
Wondering if a longer fb, such as the PVA Standard (.210) might optimize these even more.

Any chance you could take a photo of a loaded round with a bullet lined up next to it?

@khuber84 I think a short 6 CM slinging these 117’s at 2800-2850 would be absolutely phenomenal.
 
This is in your Seekins 6 CM correct? If so, SAAMI freebore of .183.

Seated at .080 off, where does this put the boat tail to shoulder junction in the case?
Wondering if a longer fb, such as the PVA Standard (.210) might optimize these even more.

Any chance you could take a photo of a loaded round with a bullet lined up next to it?

@khuber84 I think a short 6 CM slinging these 117’s at 2800-2850 would be absolutely phenomenal.

The 6 Creed was a Seekins, yes. I don't have any ammo for it loaded up at the moment. I'll see if I can make a little time tomorrow. Regarding a longer freebore, I think that'd depend on your mag constraints and how much jump you wanted, along with boattail to shoulder junction. The longer seated rounds were right at binderless AICS mag length.

The 24" Seekins was making 2960 fps without concerning pressure signs, fwiw.
 
Back
Top