Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seriously using a rifle that can shoot past 400 yards is a ridiculous advantage. I used one cell cam this year and all it did was show me that there are animals in the general area.Should we ban scopes and smokeless powder? Use whatever is legal or don’t use it… Joe
Because most people still suck at hunting!?!?if this is true then why hasn't overall hunter success rates when up? Instead they have stayed steady since folks started tracking this data.
The day is coming very soon where cell cams will actually be linked with satellite.
Exactly. I don't have a problem with all that. Just not for use by people who hold a tag for that animal during open season days.Yup, then AI tells you what it scores + pace/direction of travel...
Really?!?Pretty sure most people using cell cams on public land are just creepers hoping to catch an unsuspecting soul taking a deuce.
Sickos
The thread started on cellular trail cams specifically, which I honestly see as a fair chase issue. Getting live feed from a location is a pretty undeniable advantage. If it became the norm, I think hunting would be worse off. I feel the same way about drones and am glad that most western states got ahead of it and banned them for hunting use before it became an entrenched practice.How does a trail cam hurt? I really don't understand. It actually helps record data. If we can't use it, then game and fish should not be able to use them for research or any other matter as well. Is there any evidence more harvests are happening with and without trail cam? I really don't see the problem. People aren't going to run 20-30 cameras in wilderness areas. Maybe bigger outfitters might but the average person maybe 1 or 2 tops. Mind blowing to me people are upset about the use of trail cameras. Probably the same ones saying baiting should be banned, but then hunts over a food plot and act like that's not baiting.