LONE HUNTER
Lil-Rokslider
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2018
- Messages
- 224
Eurooptic has both on sale right now. I was thinking of setting up a 6.5 PRC just because I want to. Which rifle would you pick and why between these two?
I DMed him earlier and his response was that the seekins work fine but are plagued with the same issues all other R700 platform rifles are. He recommended a Tikka.I’m in the exact same predicament right now. Having handled both, the question is, do you like the stock on the seekins, if not, then go tikka and get the stock you want for the same scratch.
The only other consideration I’ve been pondering is due to @Formidilosus bringing up, the reliability rem 700 pattern trigger systems in rough conditions. But I’ll let him elaborate on the severity, cause, and possible fixes, as I’m unsure as to what triggers are affected/if trigger techs suffer the same problems.
To Form: saw an interesting point made about the trigger tech in the seekins, apparently the pull weight decreases with cold temp. Happen to know any background not this?
The PH2 could still need some inletting, but likely not drastic. Personally I don't like the steel barrel adapter and aluminum action on the element. It probably works fine, but it's just an extra failure point in my mind. I have a couple Christensen's. Both just standard Mesas. One in 6.5 CM and one in 7mm RM. The 6.5 has been a solid rifle. Abused a fair amount and has taken half a dozen deer. The 7mm has always been less accurate for whatever reason...... I don't know, Christensen appears to be so hit or miss with their quality. Granted I'm sure most of the awesome rifles they've produced no one ever says anything about. Always hear the horror stories because those people have an axe to grind and the motivation to make it known.longgunner on YouTube last night that the ph2 would fit in a rem 700 stock but the element would not
Yes based on stories I’ve read here I’ve got to play the lotto. My 6.5 prc ridgeline was awesome, my 7 prc ridgeline is great, I’ve got to Leupolds that’s never failed. I think I like the ph2 a little better over the element. I had decided on swaro x5i scope if I went element or FFT.The PH2 could still need some inletting, but likely not drastic. Personally I don't like the steel barrel adapter and aluminum action on the element. It probably works fine, but it's just an extra failure point in my mind. I have a couple Christensen's. Both just standard Mesas. One in 6.5 CM and one in 7mm RM. The 6.5 has been a solid rifle. Abused a fair amount and has taken half a dozen deer. The 7mm has always been less accurate for whatever reason...... I don't know, Christensen appears to be so hit or miss with their quality. Granted I'm sure most of the awesome rifles they've produced no one ever says anything about. Always hear the horror stories because those people have an axe to grind and the motivation to make it known.
I hear ya, I guess what I was getting at is exactly how severe the issues are, which was prompted by a conversation with a smith the other day. In his experience, he had found that most of the issues were related to use of improper Lubricants/improper maintenance which got my gears turning. Thus, if this was true, maybe there would be a workaround to make the trigger topic a non issue.I DMed him earlier and his response was that the seekins work fine but are plagued with the same issues all other R700 platform rifles are. He recommended a Tikka.
Don't the Seekins use trigger tech? I am not aware of issues with trigger tech triggers..... granted I also haven't really looked into it.I hear ya, I guess what I was getting at is exactly how severe the issues are, which was prompted by a conversation with a smith the other day. In his experience, he had found that most of the issues were related to use of improper Lubricants/improper maintenance which got my gears turning. Thus, if this was true, maybe there would be a workaround to make the trigger topic a non issue.