Rifle scopes you'd love to see Form test

walk2112 said:
If money grew on trees (and I owned a forest):
www.eurooptic.com

Schmidt Bender 3-18x42mm META FFP SBX 1.FP 0,1mrad ccw ST LT/ ST ZC LT Riflescope 158-811-33F-K2-03 For Sale | SHIPS FREE - EuroOptic

FREE SHIPPING on Schmidt Bender 3-18x42mm META FFP SBX 1.FP 0,1mrad ccw ST LT/ ST ZC LT Riflescope 158-811-33F-K2-03
www.eurooptic.com www.eurooptic.com
Click to expand...
This a fantastic scope, I got a chance to play with one a bit at the Alaska NRL match. Much better turrets than the PM series (imho), glass was excellent and I really liked the reticle. Assuming it has S&B pedigree of durability, I'm not sure their is a better light weight crossover hunting scope made.
 
Wiscgunner said:
This a fantastic scope, I got a chance to play with one a bit at the Alaska NRL match. Much better turrets than the PM series (imho), glass was excellent and I really liked the reticle. Assuming it has S&B pedigree of durability, I'm not sure their is a better light weight crossover hunting scope made.
Click to expand...
That’s where I came across it as well, eyebox a little tight at 18x but what do expect with a short 6x range I spose. Otherwise, I was pretty damn impressed by it. Until I asked the price 😂
 
walk2112 said:
That’s where I came across it as well, eyebox a little tight at 18x but what do expect with a short 6x range I spose. Otherwise, I was pretty damn impressed by it. Until I asked the price 😂
Click to expand...
The price is certainly lofty but I am more of a buy once cry once guy and glass really does matter to me. The Rs1.2 is nice...and cheap in comparison but the glass is lacking to me. I am strongly considering this scope. just might take me a bit to grow the extra kidney before I can put it on my rifle. I find the full mil "hard click" thing S&B does to be silly and causes me to spill over most of the time when I have tried them. Will never put my money into something with those turrets but the Hunting version has a much softer, "hard click" and I thought abut perfect to notice the full mil point but did not cause me to spill over.

I will likely get a baby razor when they come out this fall and see how durable that is, if the glass is Gen3 quality.
But, if I don't absolutely love it, the S&B will have to be the next step.
 
Dobermann said:
Have you done a search of 'LHRS' with Form in the 'By' field? You'll find 'comments' based on multiple examples of the type.
Click to expand...
Absolutely i have. That’s what convinced me to buy one. But, it hasn’t been actually ran through the test with a full report. I understand why, considering the LRHS2 is the only one currently available, but neither one has actually been tested.
 
Coleredding00 said:
Absolutely i have. That’s what convinced me to buy one. But, it hasn’t been actually ran through the test with a full report. I understand why, considering the LRHS2 is the only one currently available, but neither one has actually been tested.
Click to expand...
If you own it why not just test it yourself. Warranty on bushnell pretty good isnt it. Forms tests are no guarantee.
 
Stocky said:
If you own it why not just test it yourself. Warranty on bushnell pretty good isnt it. Forms tests are no guarantee.
Click to expand...
I wasn’t even the one who wanted it tested. I was just stating that it had not been formally tested. I didn’t think that would be so controversial.
 
Coleredding00 said:
I wasn’t even the one who wanted it tested. I was just stating that it had not been formally tested. I didn’t think that would be so controversial.
Click to expand...
Wasnt a controversial statement. I think your reading into it. That statements to anyone assuming forms test make "their" scope safe. I did think you were the original poster though but the statement wasnt trying to shit down a test by form juts that testing ones own gears a good idea.

I have an RS1.2 on the way back from a warranty claim after being dropped on concrete (brothers pack dragged it out of the backseat). No fault of the optic but i think some guys would assume its good to go based on the forum at times. It passed prior in pinned talleys. Scope or rings had a 0.3 mil zero shift but it broke the parallax dial hence the warranty claim.

I'll happily trust the next one just as soon as I test that one too.
 
How about the Sig Tango6T? I’ve been using the them (gently, range only) on the Army M110A1 and the Air Force’s 5.56 version on M4s.

I hate the reticle, especially with sub par glass. Zeroing at 100 with that reticle is guesswork for my eyes. But no idea how it holds up to real field use.

Anyway, looking for more reason to dislike it…
 
JDBAK said:
How about the Sig Tango6T? I’ve been using the them (gently, range only) on the Army M110A1 and the Air Force’s 5.56 version on M4s.

I hate the reticle, especially with sub par glass. Zeroing at 100 with that reticle is guesswork for my eyes. But no idea how it holds up to real field use.

Anyway, looking for more reason to dislike it…
Click to expand...


IMG_9249.jpeg

IMG_9250.jpeg

IMG_9251.jpeg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
Which fixed scope on which rifle?
Replies
15
Views
594
Parkerpusher
P
RWT
Sightmark Presidio 3x18x50 drop test
Replies
16
Views
1K
ResearchinStuff
ResearchinStuff
D
Sightron S1 G2 scopes
Replies
6
Views
529
rickyw
rickyw
M
your experience with atf form 5320.20 "Application to Transport Interstate..." for a suppressor
Replies
3
Views
307
nettereo16
nettereo16
passinggas33
Scope Ring Evaluation
2
Replies
34
Views
1K
walk2112
W

Latest posts

Featured Video

Latest Articles

Back
Top