Recommendations for mounting a Credo 3-9 X 40

Skydog

FNG
Joined
Dec 11, 2024
Messages
4
I’m new here (first post) as an official member, but I’ve spent many hours on the forum and read many of the threads here. I will admit that I am fascinated by the discussions of long-range hunting and the specialized equipment/modern cartridges used in the pursuit of making precision shots on game at long range. And so, I apologize in advance for the mundane nature of my question...it’s about an old gun, an even older cartridge, and shots at short to moderate ranges.

Gun: Browning A-bolt (original A-bolt manufactured in 1988).
Caliber: .270 Winchester
Use: Whitetail hunting from tree stands in NC and SC with shots ranging anywhere from 10 yards to a max of 300-400 yards.

I’ve been hunting with this same rifle for 25+ years. It has above average accuracy for a factory gun. It’s taken a bunch of deer. So, I’m perfectly content with the platform and the cartridge for my needs, but I’m ready for some new optics. My current scope (Leupold Vari-X III) has issues with maintaining zero, and after finding this forum (and the drop tests), I think I know why. For my new scope, I’ve decided on a Trijicon Credo 3-9 X 40.

My question is...what is the best mounting system for the new scope? I’ve read a lot on this forum about picatinny rails, high dollar bases/rings, lapping rings, bedding bases/rails, etc. Is any of that needed or beneficial for my setup, or would it be overkill for my intended usage?

Would a one-piece picatinny rail obstruct the ejection port on my A-bolt and cause issues? I know that Trijicon makes a two-piece picatinny rail specifically for the A-bolt. Would the picatinny rail (one or two piece) provide any advantages to me?

Should I just stick with the old style, traditional looking, standard rings and bases since it’s an older rifle?

I know I won’t be shooting at extreme long range, or backpacking over rugged terrain, etc. but I do want a rugged, quality setup that will consistently maintain zero. Suggestions?

Thank you!
 

_S_R_

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Messages
115
I’m new here (first post) as an official member, but I’ve spent many hours on the forum and read many of the threads here. I will admit that I am fascinated by the discussions of long-range hunting and the specialized equipment/modern cartridges used in the pursuit of making precision shots on game at long range. And so, I apologize in advance for the mundane nature of my question...it’s about an old gun, an even older cartridge, and shots at short to moderate ranges.

Gun: Browning A-bolt (original A-bolt manufactured in 1988).
Caliber: .270 Winchester
Use: Whitetail hunting from tree stands in NC and SC with shots ranging anywhere from 10 yards to a max of 300-400 yards.

I’ve been hunting with this same rifle for 25+ years. It has above average accuracy for a factory gun. It’s taken a bunch of deer. So, I’m perfectly content with the platform and the cartridge for my needs, but I’m ready for some new optics. My current scope (Leupold Vari-X III) has issues with maintaining zero, and after finding this forum (and the drop tests), I think I know why. For my new scope, I’ve decided on a Trijicon Credo 3-9 X 40.

My question is...what is the best mounting system for the new scope? I’ve read a lot on this forum about picatinny rails, high dollar bases/rings, lapping rings, bedding bases/rails, etc. Is any of that needed or beneficial for my setup, or would it be overkill for my intended usage?

Would a one-piece picatinny rail obstruct the ejection port on my A-bolt and cause issues? I know that Trijicon makes a two-piece picatinny rail specifically for the A-bolt. Would the picatinny rail (one or two piece) provide any advantages to me?

Should I just stick with the old style, traditional looking, standard rings and bases since it’s an older rifle?

I know I won’t be shooting at extreme long range, or backpacking over rugged terrain, etc. but I do want a rugged, quality setup that will consistently maintain zero. Suggestions?

Thank you!
less bolts less point of failure
 
OP
S

Skydog

FNG
Joined
Dec 11, 2024
Messages
4
I've seen a lot of negative feedback on this forum in regard to Talley rings cracking/failing, so I'm somewhat leery of trying them.
 
Joined
Nov 19, 2021
Messages
424
If you think your current ring and base combo is good, I would suggest starting with that.

If you want to upgrade, I would look at any options that Warne offers for your rifle.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2024
Messages
5
I have the Talley scope mounts on 4 rifles ranging from 6.5cm to 300 win mag. The 300 has been my main hunting rifle for several years. No issues or failures. I do bed the bases with Devcon when I install them. Lots of good options out there. Just stay away from the redfield/leupold style with the opposing screws on the rear mount. They are a weak link. Just my 2cents
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2024
Messages
5
A 1 piece pic rail and rings will partially cover the ejection port. Ejection shouldn’t be an issue. They do mount the scope a little high on a standard stock. This may or may not be an issue for you. Everyone has different preferences. Nightforce pic rails are quality and have always worked good for me. The 2 piece picitanny bases work good also
 
Joined
Nov 27, 2023
Messages
342
I’ve use both Leupolds and Talleys on many Browning A bolts without issue (or testing) but, I’ve since started swapping to Leupold picatinny rails for my A Bolts (and some others) and Warne Mountain Techs. You won’t have ejection issues with a pic rail on an A Bolt, and you’ll have more flexibility for eye relief with a full rail.

Your scope choice is a solid one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
OP
S

Skydog

FNG
Joined
Dec 11, 2024
Messages
4
I’ve use both Leupolds and Talleys on many Browning A bolts without issue (or testing) but, I’ve since started swapping to Leupold picatinny rails for my A Bolts (and some others) and Warne Mountain Techs. You won’t have ejection issues with a pic rail on an A Bolt, and you’ll have more flexibility for eye relief with a full rail.

Your scope choice is a solid one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Have you had any issues with adjusting to the scope being mounted higher due to swapping to the picatinny rail?
 
Top