Would you have any qualms about shooting the shorter xii 2.1s (.43 vs .55) with a mechanical? Would be 3 Fletch helical
Those are the ones I'm shooting....the .43" 2.1's. And even though I used them in a 3-fletch with a mechanical on the bull in my avatar, I prefer them in a 4-fletch. They just seem to be more consistent that way. Even for 3D I went all 4-fletch.
Don't do it.I am just joining this conversation after reading some of your guys' reports. I currently shoot Victory RIP TKO Gamers using Blazer X2s in a 4-vane 1 degree helical and have great performance with them. However, as I am always trying to make my equipment and hunting experiences better I am really interested in trying out a XII SL (1.75) in a similar 4-vane configuration. Anybody have any insight?
I recently switched to these vanes and have been pleased. I used 4 fletch on a Bohning wrap. No helical offset.
For those doing 4 fletch, are you still using a helical offset? I can't think 1 degree could make that much of a difference but I might have to wrap one up to compare.
The only reason not to offset is if you are running a Whisker Biscuit. You have to give the arrow some sort of direction during flight, or the environment will choose the direction for you. It's all kind of a balancing act. Dudley was shooting 1 degree offset back when he was using 4 Max Stealths. Now that he shoots that smaller 23 vane he is running 2.5 degrees to make up for less surface area.I recently switched to these vanes and have been pleased. I used 4 fletch on a Bohning wrap. No helical offset.
For those doing 4 fletch, are you still using a helical offset? I can't think 1 degree could make that much of a difference but I might have to wrap one up to compare.
I tried the 2.1 in a 4 fletch, found the 3 inch was more consistent with both a 3 fletch helical and 4 fletch straight offset. I switched to 4 just so I don’t have to pay attention to what vane is up.I am going to try the q2i x-ii 2.1 vanes but was also curious about the q2i x-ii 2.1sl vanes. But in thought they may be low enough to need a 3" 4 fletch.
Been shooting 4-fletch Q2is for the last couple years. Going to try out TAC vanes in both three and four fletch configurations in the coming weeks and see how I like them. They are going to have to be pretty solid to make me want to switch from the Q2is. I’m just a tinkerer and can’t help myself...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I've been using 2.75 drivers, 4 fletch, with a left helical this season, some thoughts...
- Quiet, dead quiet... I was at a shoot and someone pulled me aside to ask what vane I was running because it was the only arrow that didn't make noise.
- They cut down on weight in the back which was great...
* 4x Driver 2.75's = 23.6gr
* 4x Q2I XII's 3" = 40.4gr
- When shooting through a target the TAC's don't retain shape, they're such a hard vane. I did end up having to refletch two of the arrows because I drilled them into a foam backstop. The XII's though would go through and come back to shape very easily. Folks could make an argument that the TAC's don't pass through AS easy.
- The XII's are very easy to glue. The TAC's on the other hand require more attention, I had a few vanes come off in the beginning with the drivers.
Overall, both stabilize my broadhead very well.
I don't think it matters how much surface area you have if you don't have the proper vane height. There is a reason that vanes designed for fixed heads are 0.5 inches high. This tiny vane craze is something that has carried over from the target world that simply doesn't work.I should have my Q2i xii 2.1 in soon and looking forward to trying tge 4 fletch with them. The 1.75 didnt work as well even in a 6 fletch for me
I've been using 2.75 drivers, 4 fletch, with a left helical this season, some thoughts...
- Quiet, dead quiet... I was at a shoot and someone pulled me aside to ask what vane I was running because it was the only arrow that didn't make noise.
- They cut down on weight in the back which was great...
* 4x Driver 2.75's = 23.6gr
* 4x Q2I XII's 3" = 40.4gr
- When shooting through a target the TAC's don't retain shape, they're such a hard vane. I did end up having to refletch two of the arrows because I drilled them into a foam backstop. The XII's though would go through and come back to shape very easily. Folks could make an argument that the TAC's don't pass through AS easy.
- The XII's are very easy to glue. The TAC's on the other hand require more attention, I had a few vanes come off in the beginning with the drivers.
Overall, both stabilize my broadhead very well.