Perfect Combo of Image Stabilizing Bino and Alpha Bino?

apkleinschmidt

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Sep 25, 2017
Messages
181
I'm currently playing around with Sig Zulu 6 HDX 12x42 and Swaro NL Pure 10x42 to figure out what bino combo to run. My question is whether I'd be better off with 14x NL Pure for the tripod and Zulu 6 10x or 12x for the chest and truck? The 10x NL Pure feel a bit redundant with the Zulus.

I plan to have Zulus on my chest (and in the truck) and the NL Pure for tripod use. I love the FOV and glass quality on the NL's but I definitely handhold the Zulus better. I So...

Zulu 10x/12x and NL Pure 14x ????

OR

Zulu 12x and NL Pure 10x ????

OR

Some other combination ????
 
I’ve been curious about using the 10x Zulus, but if you can already handhold 10x binos without too much shake I’m not sure what the point is unless you’re glassing from a boat or moving car.

Seems to me that 10x and 12x are far too close to carry both.
 
Here's what I'm starting to think: The magnification isn't what separates I.S. and regular binos. The difference really is in how they get used, strategically, to look for game. Basically, I.S. is fast but low-resolution and traditional is slow but high-res.

The I.S. binos have an advantage in quick scanning -- you can cover open country very quickly (and therefore more frequently over the same time period). Whereas, the traditional binos on a tripod are slow but way more comprehensive because they have more FoV, resolution, light gathering AND you tend to lock them down completely when glassing on a tripod.

Practically speaking, it might boil down to I.S. binos are better for finding animals in large, wide-open vistas and tripod glass is better for hidden or hard to see game.

And that may be because of the strengths and limitations of each. The I.S. binos we have in 2026 don't have the resolution*FoV of regular binos, but what they do have is quick, stable deployment. So what you end up doing is flitting between different areas of interest *faster* than you would on a tripod. Simply because it's easy. Which improves your chances of catching an animal out in the open when he stands up for a brief moment. Basically, you can increase your sampling rate by moving the glass faster. But the caveat is that it will be low-res samples, not high-res samples like with alpha glass on tripod. That's how I'm starting to wrap my head around this, practically.

So for example with I.S. binos you're not going to catch the "ear flick" of a buck in his bed but you probably have a better chance of catching the buck poking out over one of the *three* saddles across from you for his 30-second look-see between 7am - 9am. And that's because you end up flitting your attention around the basin more frequently with the I.S. -- it's like ADHD for glassing.

The other thing that seems very clear is the I.S. binos of today aren't very forgiving in less than ideal conditions. If the animals don't stand up, or don't "pop" against the background, or there's fog, smoke, glare, brush, burns, anything that obscures them at all... then I think you can leave the I.S. binos at home. At least for long-range glassing. Also dusk and dawn -- regular binos have this covered way better.

That's as far as I've got in trying to figure out how to utilize the I.S. binos, at least for my purposes.
 
Back
Top