BlacktailTracker
FNG
Dang that's sweet.![]()
This is way cooler to me than a younger 4 point.
How many people have a 28” wide fork? Plenty of people have 160 4 points. Shit deer are cool to me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dang that's sweet.![]()
This is way cooler to me than a younger 4 point.
How many people have a 28” wide fork? Plenty of people have 160 4 points. Shit deer are cool to me.
I’m not trying to say anything bad about your deer.![]()
This is way cooler to me than a younger 4 point.
How many people have a 28” wide fork? Plenty of people have 160 4 points. Shit deer are cool to me.

I’m not trying to say anything bad about your deer.
I just think a hunt where the top end is 160 is a major regression in Oregon
It should be better than that.
We used to be a B&C contender.
If you want to shoot another big fork you can do it from my sliding door while sipping hot coco tho.
View attachment 1015322
Just because that’s all that’s left doesn’t make it good.Fact is most of the nation is 160/170 top end hunt, there’s very few places left where there’s truly big deer, none have easy tags on public land.
Just because that’s all that’s left doesn’t make it good.
I think this is probably the best perspective in the thread. Giants seem to come from dang near anywhere, but the average hunt that I've been on or guided across the west mirrors this. Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, Colorado, etc. We've got a good podcast planned to dive in deeper into why this is coming up!Fact is most of the nation is 160/170 top end hunt, there’s very few places left where there’s truly big deer, none have easy tags on public land.
I think this is probably the best perspective in the thread. Giants seem to come from dang near anywhere, but the average hunt that I've been on or guided across the west mirrors this. Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, Colorado, etc. We've got a good podcast planned to dive in deeper into why this is coming up!
This is what an actual helpful post to this thread looks like. With the new units, are you seeing the unit layouts to be pretty accurate to the deer herds?Just got back from a trip to the east side of OR. We saw 250+ mule deer, all on public land, and all concentrated in one 7 mile ish stretch of what I presume is their winter range. Quite a few young small 2x3 - 4x4 bucks. There was one group of 4 bucks that were all 20”+ 4x4 types with the best one being around 25” wide and 155” class.
We only saw one old mature buck with a group of 7 does. 28” ish very heavy 2x3. Very impressive looking buck. We covered about 1/4 of the very large unit, only that one spot held deer, the rest we covered was completely barren of deer with little to no sign. We were there at first and last light, mid day you would not see but a few.
A different E OR unit I’ve hunted on and off since the mid 90’s used to give out up to 1,200 tags at its peak, most years 600-750. In 2025 under 300 tags. I used to see 50+ deer a day there in the areas I frequented, now single digits in the same areas.
If you want to start hunting the east side my advice is to pick a unit you can draw often, every 2-5 years, scout it well and go hunting. If you go in cold, you will likely be frustrated. Our mule deer are struggling vs the recent past, but good fun hunting is still out there.
I have not spent enough time in the new units to say for sure. But the collar studies I’ve looked at suggest they match up better with herds than the old unit boundaries.This is what an actual helpful post to this thread looks like. With the new units, are you seeing the unit layouts to be pretty accurate to the deer herds?