OR Ferrosi pants???

ethan

WKR
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
598
Curious if anyone has tried these and if so, what are you're thoughts?
 
I'm not sure if they've changed them in the last few years but I've owned a pair for a few years and like them. Mine are really stretchy and super light weight. They are the thinnest pants I own. Good for hot weather, not so much in cooler temps.

Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
 
They are a hot weather pant and a phenomenal one at that. The new Ferrosi Crux pair would be interesting
 
I have mixed experiences, and generally run warm/sweat easily. Compare that with your own context.

They are very light, perfectly stretchy, and breathe *reasonably* well.

They ARE soft shell material, and I find they do not breathe well enough for high exertion activities over about 60*.

Additionally, because of how thin they are, you need to be careful/aware when it’s cold. With a silk-weight base layer I am comfortable with easy Nordic skiing down to about 10 degrees, and with grid fleece or mid-weight wool down to about zero- and much colder if I increase activity intensity.

All that to say, they’re a great cold weather active layer, good for temperate conditions, but for hot weather I like the zip-off version, and if I were king for a day I’d add thigh zips a la stone glacier de-havilland.

They also wear very nicely with street clothes, so I appreciate the versitility.
 
Agree with all of the above. Great pants, very thin. Go-to hot weather pants, but not warm enough for even moderately cool temps, for me at least.
 
They are pretty slim fitting on me, but they've been my favorite September archery and summer scouting pant for the last few years.
 
Anyone tried their Voodoo pants? Seems like they’re a bit thicker than the ferrosi and might be better suited to sept/Oct hunting?
 
Back
Top