Well I'm 95% certain I am going with the standard height Tibet GTX's over the Hi's. I've returned the Hi's but haven't pulled the tags off the standard height boots just in case I change my mind for some reason.
I'm planning to go with the standard height for the following reasons:
1. I feel they provide plenty of ankle support.
2. I think the pivoting lace stud is a great feature.
3. While walking up stairs to simulate walking up elevation, the Hi's hit the top of my foot slightly different which may have become uncomfortable over a period of time.
4. For walking through water and/or to keep debris from getting into the boots I'll throw a pair of gaiters on.
5. Although only 4 ounces lighter, the standard height is slightly lighter.
6. As of now I only hunt western style hunting 1 week out of the year, the rest of the time I'm hunting in Wisconsin where I don't think the height of the Hi's is necessary.
If anyone thinks I'm missing a critical reason to go with the Hi's, speak now or forever hold your peace
