elkhuntrr75
Lil-Rokslider
I am not a big antelope hunter. I put in for it every year primarily because I have already purchased a hunting license. This year, I noticed that the Nonresident opportunities to draw a tag are way down. It might have been that way for several years, but I didn’t notice it until now.
I knew that the state did divide several of the units into 2 units, north and south (GMU 31 for example). This was done to keep the total tags per unit below 15, as to not allow a NR tag to be allocated. bravo.
The NR outfitter tag numbers don’t appear to be down, at first glance, but I am not positive. I also don’t think that the statewide herd numbers are down either. I do believe that the states antelope population is near objective.
So I think that this is just pure politics. I do think that politicians should look out for their constituents but when you look at the numbers, it seems really excessive. I think nonresident hunters should take a hard look at numbers and sensibly evaluate their chances before applying. I won’t be applying for antelope this year. The odds are low enough to turn heads in Washington state and make California tag allocations appear generous.
This fight seems pretty dismal. It really seems like nonresident hunters are kicked in the mouth every time we turn around. I am by no means an accountant either, but with them holding onto NR tag money until the draw and with all the app fees, I bet the drop in revenue from the reduction in NR tags would not amount to much. What would amount to something is if we out of staters spend our money elsewhere.
NM is a beautiful state, but if they don’t want me to hunt there state then I think it is safe to say that they don’t need my tourism either. I am going to vacation elsewhere but I will write their bleeding heart governor a letter explaining why I won’t be visiting her state.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I knew that the state did divide several of the units into 2 units, north and south (GMU 31 for example). This was done to keep the total tags per unit below 15, as to not allow a NR tag to be allocated. bravo.
The NR outfitter tag numbers don’t appear to be down, at first glance, but I am not positive. I also don’t think that the statewide herd numbers are down either. I do believe that the states antelope population is near objective.
So I think that this is just pure politics. I do think that politicians should look out for their constituents but when you look at the numbers, it seems really excessive. I think nonresident hunters should take a hard look at numbers and sensibly evaluate their chances before applying. I won’t be applying for antelope this year. The odds are low enough to turn heads in Washington state and make California tag allocations appear generous.
This fight seems pretty dismal. It really seems like nonresident hunters are kicked in the mouth every time we turn around. I am by no means an accountant either, but with them holding onto NR tag money until the draw and with all the app fees, I bet the drop in revenue from the reduction in NR tags would not amount to much. What would amount to something is if we out of staters spend our money elsewhere.
NM is a beautiful state, but if they don’t want me to hunt there state then I think it is safe to say that they don’t need my tourism either. I am going to vacation elsewhere but I will write their bleeding heart governor a letter explaining why I won’t be visiting her state.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited: