Nightforce SHV 4-14x50 F1 .1 vs Nightforce NX8 2.5-20x50

jip40

FNG
Joined
Mar 25, 2016
Messages
37
Looking for some opinions on the two Nightforces. Curious if the $700 difference is really worth it. The magnification range on the new NX8 makes it really attractive. I'm looking for a new scope to put on a mtn rifle. Currently have a Leupold 6.5-20x 50 that almost forced me to miss out a close shot due to low end being 6.5. Primarily hunt in the East but go out West often.
 
OP
J

jip40

FNG
Joined
Mar 25, 2016
Messages
37
Nearest prob 20-30 yd. for whitetail, furthest 500+.
 

gr8fuldoug

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
May 21, 2013
Messages
5,490
Location
Old Bethpage, NY
The wider FOV for under 50 yards will mean worlds more to you than more power at the top end. The 2.5-20 would probably be a superior option for you as 4x under 50 yards is not suitable
 
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Messages
812
Location
MS
I picked up an NX8 2.5-20x50 from Doug not too long ago (I highly recommend calling him by the way). I called him to discuss the various options i was considering and after a bit of discussion and him asking me some questions i went with the NX8. So far I'm pleased with it. I like the 2.5 power on the low end as the field of view is great in the thick timber i mostly hunt whitetails in. Having 20x on the top end will be nice when i go out West again this year. The eye box issue many have complained about has been a non issue for me but having a rail to give more mounting versatility helps with that IMO.
 

10ring1

FNG
Joined
Feb 14, 2020
Messages
36
I have been a Leupold fanatic for many years. I just can't find something to fit my needs for NRL/ PRS. I love the higher end Athlons but I have looked at through a few nightforces and was impressed with image quality. I hope you have to look through a nx8. I like everything about it but would have to look through one before i purchased. What are you guys opinions about the image quality compared to say a higher-end Leupold? How is the edge to edge clarity?
 
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
1,010
Location
In the sticks
I have been a Leupold fanatic for many years. I just can't find something to fit my needs for NRL/ PRS. I love the higher end Athlons but I have looked at through a few nightforces and was impressed with image quality. I hope you have to look through a nx8. I like everything about it but would have to look through one before i purchased. What are you guys opinions about the image quality compared to say a higher-end Leupold? How is the edge to edge clarity?

VX 5HD, VX6HD and Mark 5HD all have same glass. Some will argue or disagree with that but it’s fact. I did the tour. Coating are same as well. The clarity, resolution, CA control, FOV, DOF, and light gathering are exceptional. Little to no distortion either. And I’m a huge NF fan, but in the last 3 years I’ve purchased 7-8 Leupolds like the ones I’ve mentioned and they are superb.
 
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
1,010
Location
In the sticks
Looking for some opinions on the two Nightforces. Curious if the $700 difference is really worth it. The magnification range on the new NX8 makes it really attractive. I'm looking for a new scope to put on a mtn rifle. Currently have a Leupold 6.5-20x 50 that almost forced me to miss out a close shot due to low end being 6.5. Primarily hunt in the East but go out West often.

In my honesty opinion the 2.5-20 is not all that great. In any way. Eye box, parallax, edge distortion and so on are poor. The 4-32 is a much better optic.
With that, the NX8 is 3 times what the SHV is. The SHV is IMO not a quality scope. I’ve seen way too many go back for repairs. The NX8 is built with same QC and and part as NXS and ATACR. A much better optic than the SHV. I would take a PST Gen 2 over the SHV.
 

BAKPAKR

WKR
Joined
May 10, 2018
Messages
1,599
Location
Appalachia
I have a couple of FFP scopes (two 3-9 SWFAs and a 3.5-21 Bushnell) and I have looked through a few others, including the 2.5-20 NX8. For me, the usefulness of the reticle at the lower end of the power range decreases as the zoom ratio increases*. I thought the reticle in the NX8 was just too fine for me to use for woods hunting.

*Edit - Before someone takes exception to my observation, I do realize that the reticle on a FFP scope covers the same area on the target regardless of the power setting or zoom ratio.
 
Last edited:
Top