Ohiohuntr
Lil-Rokslider
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2021
- Messages
- 219
I have both scopes in Mil, I prefer the atacr over the nx8 but I think for most they would be happy with either
Which reticle did you get in the 4-16? And how do you find it at 4x seeing the reticle?I have both scopes in Mil, I prefer the atacr over the nx8 but I think for most they would be happy with either
Mil c , it’s still pretty fine at 4x but visible, perfer to have it illuminated in low light, much more visible than the nx8 at 2.5Which reticle did you get in the 4-16? And how do you find it at 4x seeing the reticle?
Ok thanks. I am thinking about trying the Mil-R. I ended up getting it in the MOAR, but I’m considering trying mils.Mil c , it’s still pretty fine at 4x but visible, perfer to have it illuminated in low light, much more visible than the nx8 at 2.5
That makes sense. I’m thinking about it.I prefer mils, working in 1/10ths is easy for me plus the guys I shoot with all use mils
Which reticle did you get in the ATACR?@bowrunner81 I picked up the 4-16 ATACR this winter and used it for some long range shooting. After getting a Maven RS 1.2 and using side by side.. I sold the ATACR and going to buy another RS1.2. It wins on weight (4oz), reticle, illumination, non rotating eyepiece most certainly price.
Mil-R in all my NF scopes. Multiple NXS and the ATACR. SHR-Mil in the Maven.Which reticle did you get in the ATACR?
And if they could use whatever coatings or optical system they used on the 7-35 ATACR on the rest of the ATACR line, even better.NF on the atacr should change the non rotating eyepiece to the nx8 style, fix the tunneling on the lowest powers, add the illumination system of the Zeiss v8, actually everyone should add their system, and for gosh sake make it a center dot or cross only that illuminates, not the entire ret, then give more low settings that doesn’t blind me at dusk.