Nightforce 4-16x42mm ATACR Field Evaluation

Status
Not open for further replies.

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
8,172
To show what a full eval looks like, I conducted this on one of the scopes used to proof the rifles. This particular scope has been absolutely trashed for almost a decade. True abuse- hundreds of drops, a massive amount of rounds, etc. The reticle lens is actually cracked from a 15 foot drop . It has never lost zero, and has never failed.



Turrets:

Elevation turret is very low profile and features a “zero lock” button that is pushed in to release the turret to spin. It automatically locks when spun back to zero.

20F723A6-3E52-47B3-992C-F8B0975ADBCD.jpeg


Zero
34B7BCEB-81C0-408F-AB98-813FBA501550.jpeg


Unlocked
E9D309CF-36AC-4C33-B556-66DD822A6904.jpeg


The zero stop is similar to other NF’s, however when combined with the zero lock turret, it’s best to read the instruction manual for the process.




Windage is standard capped and rotation limited.
A46CB931-6148-46D8-A30B-9621878BC12F.jpeg



The elevation turret feel is distinct, and tactile, if a bit rounded. The Zero Lock function is excellent. 12 mils per rev. Locking is positive, and takes direct pressure to unlock. Windage turret clicks are solid and distinct.



Horus H59 reticle:

(Notice the spyder webs or thin squiggly lines around the edges, that’s the cracked glass. It does not effect function, and almost no one notices it even in use until pointed out)

4x
0F6BBA43-F5AE-4D40-B11B-788858D92CC7.jpeg



16x
F7CAC94F-2D2B-4B98-AD46-E86E8FF6923B.jpeg


The reticle is one of the first of the common tree reticle designs with a center dot and .2 mil increments in the horizontal and vertical lines, with ticks at .2 mil increments for the tree. It is a good rendition of the type for dedicated long range use, but not for general use.



Parallax:

Knob is very smooth if a bit easy to turn. Depth of focus is decent with 100-infinity being less than a quarter turn. In use it can be set to 300y and basically left for 0-600y in the field.



Initial thoughts:

Both turrets are solid and designed correctly. The Zero Lock is might be the best designed field turret on the market. The windage being capped and rotation limited is excellent. I don’t really care too much about how the turrets feel as long as they aren’t horrible and they work, but this ATACR is very good. As I’ve stated before, I would prefer if it had 10 mils per rev versus 12, but that’s a minor compliant and while not a big deal, no matter how you slice it, your brain can deal with counting up from 5 or 10 mils per rev when you go past the first revolution, rather than 12 or 24 mils.

This scope is marketed as a general purpose long range “tactical” scope that can cross over into hunting use. This particular reticle (H59) is a military or dedicated long range reticle, so while it is definitely not ideal for general hunting, it’s not a mark against this scope- the reticle matches the use. The Mil-C is a better reticle than the H59, but is still quite thin and nearly disappears on low power, low light and broken terrain without illumination.



Zeroing and Return to Zero:

Proofing the rifle and this lot of ammo was done using another scope, the 30 round group extreme spread was 1.37” at 100 yards. Zeroing the 4-16x was accomplished without issue as the scope was previously mounted on this rifle.

Right dot. Top left two shots were after remounting, adjusted down .3, right .2 mils. The group in the bottoms right of the dot is the remaining 8 rounds in the mag. Left dot is the return to zero target. 200 mils dialed between each shot for a total of 2,000 mils. It can be seen from the zero target to the RTZ target that I need to come up .1 mil.
FADE3919-3AA2-44A3-9360-E64028E19349.jpeg




“Tracking”

Next was the live fire “tracking” target. I measured using both the reticle and a spotter to be 7.75 mils between dots. I used 7.8 mils for shooting.

373AD156-3CA0-4A10-B919-639F2E694AB6.jpeg


No issues noted. This scope has been tested in a static tracking board and adjusts to less then 1% error at 20 mils.




Drop evaluation:

For an explanation see- Scope Field Eval Explanation and Standards


The “test” consists of three 18” drops on a mat- one left/right/top with a shot to check zero after each drop. Then the exact same thing repeated from 36”. Then three drops on all three sides for nine drops on the last part- 15 drops total. This is not “abuse”. The 18” drops are a joke really. The 36” start showing something. And when a scope make/model consistently goes through the whole thing without losing zero, failures in actual use are almost unheard of.

This one was conducted on packed, semi crusted snow.

It passed without issue as it has for hundreds of drops. Each shot is labeled.
7D3C2E9A-A7EA-4909-9559-7C60AE9E9597.jpeg


Remember the baseline 30 round extreme spread group was 1.37” with this ammo. The dot is one inch. Every round is within baseline.





Results:

The scope works. It functions and adjusts as it should, it holds zero. I have seen dozens of these scopes, all of them functioned correctly. Being that it passed everything, I will give my subjective views as far as eyebox, image quality, and overall use and feel in the next posts.

Discuss Here
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
Formidilosus

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
8,172
Power Ring:

The whole eyepiece rotates when changing powers. Some love this, some don’t. I used to be one of the latter until one time being stressed and tired with gloved hands realizing that the whole eyepiece gave enough purchase to consistently change power. Since then I have been ok, if not appreciative, of it. The biggest annoyance is that no matter what you do, eventually you’ll loosen the diopter focus up- even if you “snap” it. The answer is tape. Snap, and tape the eyepiece and lock ring together.




Eyebox and Eye Relief:

Other than the specs there’s not much to tell. Eye box is generally forgiving at all powers- not as large as some, but better than most. Eye relief is in the specs, and is average to good for scopes of this type.


Image Quality (glass):

Resolution is excellent. Color rendition is very good, and has more color “pop” than the NXS or SHV series. Brightness is good.





Final Thoughts:

Having used these scopes a lot, there’s nothing really unusual about them… except that they work. They are an excellent aiming device, they function as they should, they are easy to get behind and use, controls are quite good. Their largest problem, in fact Nightforce’s largest problem across the board is the lack of a true general purpose Mil reticle. Every one they make is decent to excellent for long range, and usable for close range with illumination. However, they lack something like the Mil-Quad reticle from
SWFA, or better still the THLR reticle- one that is visible and usable at low powers, in low light, in broken terrain, without illumination.

As it stands the 4-16x42mm ATACR F1 is one of the best, if not the best medium to long range field scopes on the market, and is workable at close ranges.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top