- Joined
- Apr 29, 2023
- Messages
- 2,091
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seems like every thing they bring to market comes available right after season!I feel like I read or heard on a podcast it would be late this fall or winter?
You can't just expect to hunt with a new bullet without 12 months of range data from Roksliders.Seems like every thing they bring to market comes available right after season!
I know, we Roksliders want to have our cake and eat it too.
Technically, it'll be out before next season.....Seems like every thing they bring to market comes available right after season!
I know, we Roksliders want to have our cake and eat it too.
Ope, my bad.You can't just expect to hunt with a new bullet without 12 months of range data from Roksliders.
Except if we run across Rokstok-like wait times?Technically, it'll be out before next season.....
But, it'll still get on the market before a season....Except if we run across Rokstok-like wait times?
Hunting will probably be banned by thenBut, it'll still get on the market before a season....
Shot show reveal.........then 6 month wait after that for in stock? Kinda the norm with shot show releases.ShotShow
Am newbie here…what’s this new bullet??
Will a 7.5 twist stabilize this?
.560+ G1 107 TMK is more appealing on paper than a .590 g1 117 to me.I know sierra at one time, did make a 117gr tipped bullet for DTAC, BC according to AB was 0.550 G1.
Rumors have also been circulating about a 107 TMK coming too.
With the 95gr TMK already providing huge wounds and 16"+ penetration with a .500 BC, it seems this new bullet is really only ideal for the truly long range 6prc/6UM level of gun that could overspin the 95gr. What does the 117(ish) at a higher .5X BC gain you in 6CM over the 95, maybe 1mph wind # but probably not with the velocity difference, and same terminal range. Just an even more destructive wound, but at the cost of more recoil. Perhaps fits the chamber better, but so what. What am I missing?MIT should work in a 1-8”. It is not a super aggressive design for the highest BC. It is a good BC (should be high .5 G1) with typical TMK terminal performance- that is to say destructive.
With the 95gr TMK already providing huge wounds and 16"+ penetration with a .500 BC, it seems this new bullet is really only ideal for the truly long range 6prc/6UM level of gun that could overspin the 95gr. What does the 117(ish) at a higher .5X BC gain you in 6CM over the 95, maybe 1mph wind # but probably not with the velocity difference, and same terminal range. Just an even more destructive wound, but at the cost of more recoil. Perhaps fits the chamber better, but so what. What am I missing?
More bigger more gooder, yes...