New scope for woods rifle

Doesn’t bother me when people recommend more expensive things. It gives me something to look for second hand. It also gives me an idea of “how much does exactly what I want cost?”
This is the hard part when people ask "what's your budget?" as the first step in picking out any piece of gear. You don't always know what you can get for a given price point, where the diminishing returns are, or if it's really worth stretching your budget for something better.
 
I hunt similar mature eastern hardwood forests to what you are talking about. The best scope I’ve found for my use is the 3-9x42 SWFA.

Keep in mind the exit pupil of a 3-9x42 at 3x is greater than your eye could ever use; so going to a x50 or x56 isn’t really going to help you much at low magnification.

In my experience, I can typically see deer well enough that I could shoot 10-15 minutes before or after legal light (depending on morning or evening) with that scope. The reticle is a little fine at the really low light, but by legal light it’s very visible.

If you want drastically better low light performance I think you’d really have to increase your budget to S&B levels
 
I hunt similar mature eastern hardwood forests to what you are talking about. The best scope I’ve found for my use is the 3-9x42 SWFA.

Keep in mind the exit pupil of a 3-9x42 at 3x is greater than your eye could ever use; so going to a x50 or x56 isn’t really going to help you much at low magnification.

In my experience, I can typically see deer well enough that I could shoot 10-15 minutes before or after legal light (depending on morning or evening) with that scope. The reticle is a little fine at the really low light, but by legal light it’s very visible.

If you want drastically better low light performance I think you’d really have to increase your budget to S&B levels
I have had the exact same experience with my SWFA 3-9 which I didn’t expect. They easily take me past legal light even in thick woods in a holler in Kentucky which hasn’t been the case for a lot of other more expensive scopes I have.
 
I was going to suggest the 3-9 but you’ve already got it. But if light weight for a MBR gun to 300 hundred - not many better. The 1 mil dots reticle is still useable for wind or hold over at those ranges. Still you can have Kenton make a custom cap based on yardage not moa if I’d be used at one elevation ish.
Kenton doesn't do turrets for Trijicon scopes with dust caps
 
Exit pupil is a thing. A large objective is not always useable. Something not considered here much. A human eye can only let so much light in.

6x42mm and 8x56mm both have a 7mm exit pupil.


The human pupil maxes out its diameter at about 7mm, give or take depending on the person. Exit pupil comes from dividing the objective diameter by the magnification. These two scopes are set up to be pretty optimal for a human pupil at full dilation.
 
I hunt similar mature eastern hardwood forests to what you are talking about. The best scope I’ve found for my use is the 3-9x42 SWFA.

Keep in mind the exit pupil of a 3-9x42 at 3x is greater than your eye could ever use; so going to a x50 or x56 isn’t really going to help you much at low magnification.

In my experience, I can typically see deer well enough that I could shoot 10-15 minutes before or after legal light (depending on morning or evening) with that scope. The reticle is a little fine at the really low light, but by legal light it’s very visible.

If you want drastically better low light performance I think you’d really have to increase your budget to S&B levels
Yup. I have an older Mil-dot version on my 223. Works like a charm, even in the timber!
 
Back
Top